A knowledge-driven model to assess inherent safety in process infrastructure
View/ Open
Kabir_et_al_Safety (2.613Mb)
Download
Publication date
2023-06Rights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccess
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Process safety has drawn increasing attention in recent years and has been investigated from different perspectives, such as quantitative risk analysis, consequence modeling, and regulations. However, rare attempts have been made to focus on inherent safety design assessment, despite being the most cost-effective safety tactic and its vital role in sustainable development and safe operation of process infrastructure. Accordingly, the present research proposed a knowledge-driven model to assess inherent safety in process infrastructure under uncertainty. We first developed a holistic taxonomy of contributing factors into inherent safety design considering chemical, reaction, process, equipment, human factors, and organizational concerns associated with process plants. Then, we used subject matter experts, content validity ratio (CVR), and content validity index (CVI) to validate the taxonomy and data collection tools. We then employed a fuzzy inference system and the Extent Analysis (EA) method for knowledge acquisition under uncertainty. We tested the proposed model on a steam methane-reforming plant that produces hydrogen as renewable energy. The findings revealed the most contributing factors and indicators to improve the inherent safety design in the studied plant and effectively support the decision-making process to assign proper safety countermeasures.Version
Published versionCitation
Gholamizadeh K, Zarei E, Kabir S et al (2023) A knowledge-driven model to assess inherent safety in process infrastructure. Safety. 9(2): 37.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9020037Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9020037