Loading...
Public participation and policy: unpacking connections in one British LA21
Sharp, Liz
Sharp, Liz
Publication Date
2002
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Keywords
Rights
© 2002 Taylor & Francis: Routledge. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Collections
Additional title
Abstract
Within western cultures, the term `public participation¿ has strong positive connotations, and is associated with the promotion of democracy. The contention of this paper is that these invocations of democracy - although not entirely inaccurate - obscure the varied and tangible effects of public participation on wider policy processes. Drawing on Sharp and Connelly 2001, this paper argues that participation should not be analysed in terms of the type of democracy it invokes, but rather in terms of the extent and nature of its influence on the policy process. In particular, the policy process is examined for conflict between participants over (1) the extent of participation, (2) the nature of participation and (3) the influence of the participation, as well as (4) the outcomes to which it leads. This approach to the analysis of participation is demonstrated through a study of one element of participation in an authority¿s Local Agenda 21 process. The paper concludes that participation is inherently political and practitioners need to act strategically to manage participation in support of progressive agendas.
Version
Accepted manuscript
Citation
Sharp, L. (2002). Participation and Policy: unpacking connections in one UK LA21. Local Environment. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 7-22(16).
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Article