Loading...
National Implementation Measures
Pearson, Graham S. Sims, N.A.
Pearson, Graham S.
Sims, N.A.
Citations
Altmetric:
Publication Date
1998-01
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
� 1998 University of Bradford. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk)
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Files
Loading...
bp4.pdf
Adobe PDF, 435.92 KB
Additional title
Abstract
Article IV of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention sets out the obligation for States Parties to implement the BTWC through appropriate national measures. Although some States have enacted such legislation, others have not, and the Aum Shinrikyo incident in Tokyo in March 1995 underlined the importance of appropriate penal legislation both to implement the BTWC (and the Chemical Weapons Convention) and to criminalise any development, production, stockpiling or acquisition of such weapons for terrorist or criminal purposes. This Briefing Paper reviews the development of the language relating to Article IV of the BTWC by the four Review Conferences, notes the requirements of the Chemical Weapons Convention and then addresses the opportunity provided by the Ad Hoc Group negotiations to strengthen the BTWC through stronger implementation measures.
Version
Published version
Citation
Pearson GS and Sims NA (1998) National Implementation Measures. Bradford, Bradford Disarmament Research Centre, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford. BTWC Briefing Papers: 1st Series, No 4.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Link to Version of Record
Type
Report