Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Sex and age differences in attitudes and intention to adopt personalised nutrition in a UK sample

Stewart-Knox, Barbara
Poinhos, R.
Fischer, A.R.H.
Chaudhrey, M.
Rankin, A.
Publication Date
2022
End of Embargo
Supervisor
Rights
(c) 2022 SpringerNature. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature's AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01676-x.
Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Open Access status
openAccess
Accepted for publication
2021-11-11
Institution
Department
Awarded
Embargo end date
Additional title
Abstract
There has been an increase in development of technologies that can deliver personalised dietary advice. Devising healthy, sustainable dietary plans will mean taking consideration of extrinsic factors such as individual social circumstances. The aim of this study was to identify societal groups more or less receptive to and likely to engage with digitally delivered personalised nutrition initiatives. Sample and Methods: Volunteers were recruited via a social research agency from within the UK. The resultant sample (N=1061) was 49% female, aged 18-65 years. Results: MANOVA (Tukey HSD applied) indicated that females and younger people (aged 18-29 years) had more favourable attitudes and were more likely to intend to adopt personalised nutrition. There were no differences in attitude toward or intention to adopt personalised nutrition between different education levels, income brackets or occupational groups. Conclusion: These results imply that females and younger people may be most likely to adopt personalised nutrition in the future. Initiatives to promote personalised nutrition should target males and older people.
Version
Accepted manuscript
Citation
Stewart-Knox B, Poinhos R, Fischer ARH et al (2022) Sex and age differences in attitudes and intention to adopt personalised nutrition in a UK sample. Journal of Public Health. 31: 1277-1283.
Link to publisher’s version
Link to published version
Type
Article
Qualification name
Notes