Human skeletal asymmetry. A study of directional and fluctuating asymmetry in assessing health, environmental conditions, and social status in English populations from the 7th to the 19th centuries.
View/ Open
R. Storm Thesis.pdf (4.089Mb)
Download
Title Page Appendix.pdf (98.68Kb)
Download
Insert-Code Sheet.pdf (53.44Kb)
Download
Appendix 1 Craniometric Landmarks.pdf (53.25Kb)
Download
Appendix 2 Measurements.pdf (4.436Mb)
Download
Appendix 3 Recording Forms.pdf (342.8Kb)
Download
Appendix 4 Population Outliers.pdf (783.7Kb)
Download
Appendix 5 Measurement Error.pdf (457.4Kb)
Download
Appendix 6 DA Descriptive Statistics.pdf (2.873Mb)
Download
Appendix 7 Results from DA Comparisons.pdf (1.752Mb)
Download
Appendix 8 FA Descriptive Statistics.pdf (2.461Mb)
Download
Appendix 9 Results from FA Comparisons.pdf (2.078Mb)
Download
Appendix 10 Chi Square Tests of Population Outliers.pdf (626.2Kb)
Download
Publication date
2010-06-07T14:37:04ZAuthor
Storm, Rebecca A.Supervisor
Knüsel, Christopher J.Buckberry, Jo
Keyword
Human skeletal asymmetryDirectional asymmetry
Fluctuating asymmetry
laterality
Stress markers
Developmental instability
Congenital conditions
Osteological analysis
Rights
The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
Institution
University of BradfordDepartment
Division of Archaeological, Geographical and Environmental SciencesAwarded
2009
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Asymmetry is a useful tool for osteological analysis as it detects disruptions in the developmental stability of osseous structures attributed to environmental and biomechanical environments. The primary aim of this study is to establish a baseline for normal levels of asymmetry in English archaeological populations in order to distinguish between normal population variation and increased developmental instability or biomechanical stress. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry is assessed through a database of a comprehensive selection of osteological measurements throughout the skeletons of 1753 adults and subadults. The sample is from 11 archaeological sites spanning the Anglo-Saxon to the Victorian periods. The extent of developmental instability is also determined, for the first time, by employing the prevalence of population outliers. The normal range for directional asymmetry was found to be -5.79 to 6.62%, while fluctuating asymmetry was found to be 0 to 6.53%. The extent of asymmetry, however, was found to be trait specific. Deviations from normal population levels of asymmetry were found to be due to a complex mixture of biomechanical and environmental stresses influenced by age, sex, settlement type, socio-economic status, and period-specific origins of the sample populations. Possible causes of asymmetry could be discerned from comparisons of the levels of population asymmetry when placed in the context of physical activity, social networking, health, and environment developed from the historical, archaeological and osteological record.Type
ThesisQualification name
PhDCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The March of Time: Evolving Conceptions of Time in the Light of Scientific DiscoveriesWeinert, Friedel (2013)The aim of this interdisciplinary study is to reconstruct the evolution of our changing conceptions of time in the light of scientific discoveries. It will adopt a new perspective and organize the material around three central themes, which run through our history of time reckoning: cosmology and regularity; stasis and flux; symmetry and asymmetry. It is the physical criteria that humans choose ¿ relativistic effects and time-symmetric equations or dynamic-kinematic effects and asymmetric conditions ¿ that establish our views on the nature of time. This book will defend a dynamic rather than a static view of time.
-
The enigma of facial asymmetry: is there a gender-specific pattern of facedness?Rodway, Paul; Hancock, P.; Hardie, S.; Penton-Voak, I.; Wright, L.; Carson, D. (2005)Although facial symmetry correlates with facial attractiveness, human faces are often far from symmetrical with one side frequently being larger than the other (Kowner, 1998). Smith (2000) reported that male and female faces were asymmetrical in opposite directions, with males having a larger area on the left side compared to the right side, and females having a larger right side compared to the left side. The present study attempted to replicate and extend this finding. Two databases of facial images from Stirling and St Andrews Universities, consisting of 180 and 122 faces respectively, and a third set of 62 faces collected at Abertay University, were used to examine Smith¿s findings. Smith¿s unique method of calculating the size of each hemiface was applied to each set. For the Stirling and St Andrew¿s sets a computer program did this automatically and for the Abertay set it was done manually. No significant overall effect of gender on facial area asymmetry was found. However, the St. Andrews sample demonstrated a similar effect to Smith, with females having a significantly larger mean area of right hemiface and males having a larger left hemiface. In addition, for the Abertay faces handedness had a significant effect on facial asymmetry with right handers having a larger left side of the face. These findings give limited support for Smith¿s results but do also suggest that finding such an asymmetry may depend upon some as yet unidentified factors inherent in some methods of image collection.
-
Peer effects in the online peer-to-peer lending market: Ex-ante selection and ex-post learningHo, K.C.; Gu, Y.; Yan, C.; Gozgor, Giray (2024-03)This study investigates peer effects in the online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending market using data from a Chinese online lending platform, Renrendai. The empirical results indicate that both the borrowers' success rate in obtaining loans and the default rate after loans are deemed non-coercive among their peers, referred to as the peer effects of lending and peer effects of default, respectively. The peer effect of lending is more pronounced in high-risk cities, whereas the peer effect of defaulting is more pronounced for borrowers with more difficulty obtaining loans, indicating ex-ante selection and ex-post learning mechanisms, respectively. The peer effects of lending promote P2P lending market efficiency, and the peer effects of defaulting inhibit market efficiency. Collectively, our results suggest that both lenders and borrowers follow peer effects to reduce information asymmetry in P2P lending markets.