View/ Open
Main article (771.2Kb)
Download
Publication date
2014-11Author
Weinert, FriedelRights
© 2014 Springer. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9342-yPeer-Reviewed
yes
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Thomas S. Kuhn is famous both for his work on the Copernican Revolution and his ‘paradigm’ view of scientific revolutions. But Kuhn later abandoned the notion of paradigm (and related notions) in favour of a more ‘evolutionary’ view of the history of science. Kuhn’s position therefore moved closer to ‘continuity’ models of scientific progress, for instance ‘chain-of-reasoning’ models, originally championed by D. Shapere. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the debate around Kuhn’s new ‘developmental’ view and to evaluate these competing models with reference to some major innovations in the history of cosmology, from Copernicanism to modern cosmology. This evaluation is made possible through some unexpected overlap between Kuhn’s earlier discontinuity model and various versions of the later continuity models. It is the thesis of this paper that the ‘chain-of-reasoning’ model accounts better for the cosmological evidence than both Kuhn’s early paradigm model and his later developmental view of the history of science.Version
Accepted ManuscriptCitation
Weinert F (2014) Lines of Descent: Kuhn and Beyond. Foundations of Science 19(4): 331-352.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9342-yType
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9342-y