Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Paul W.*
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-10T17:19:49Z
dc.date.available2016-10-10T17:19:49Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationSullivan PW (2014) Dialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal. 2: 77-84.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/9880
dc.descriptionYes
dc.description.abstractIt appears that in September, 2011, Rome experienced much more than a dialogue on dialogic pedagogy but a gladiatorial clash of personalities and ideas. Heat, we are told, was generated (above, p.1) and in the dissipation of this heat on to the page, even the reader gets hot and flushed. We are told that arguments “fail” (above, p.16); that terms “are not clearly defined” (p.21), breakthroughs in classification (e.g. epistemological dialogical pedagogy) are tackled and dragged down to personal eccentricities “his so-called epistemological dialogical pedagogy” (p.22), politeness tries to get a grip periodically, “I agree. But maybe I agree with Kiyo only to a point” but shouting (e.g. capital letters/underlining terms – e.g. “NOT the exclusive practice” (p.26)) and assertions take over. Accusation fly - sometimes to the point of legal charges “I charge the Epistemological Pedagogical Dialogue II with...” (p.29).
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2014.123
dc.rights© 2014 The Author. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/)
dc.subjectHero; Pedagogical violence; Eros
dc.titleDialogue on Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
dc.status.refereedYes
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.versionPublished version
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-25T13:12:54Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
sullivan_2014.pdf
Size:
322.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record