View/ Open
Jeffrey_Int_Jnl_of_Therapy_and_Rehabilitation.pdf (492.0Kb)
Download
Publication date
2016-06Keyword
Chronic painHealth-realted quality of life
Pain intensity
Progressive muscle relaxation
Relaxation
Rights
© 2016 Mark Allen Healthcare. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
2016-02-10
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Chronic non-malignant pain is a global condition with a complex biopsychosocial impact on the sufferers. Relaxation skills are commonly included as part of a pain management programme, which is currently the recommended evidence-based intervention for this group of patients. However, there is little evidence behind the choice of relaxation method implemented, or their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of relaxation skills in the management of chronic non-malignant pain, related to pain intensity and health-related quality of life. A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro and PsycARTICLES. The Cochrane, DARE and Trip databases were also accessed, and searches were carried out using the terms (relaxation OR relaxation therapy OR relaxation training) AND (pain OR chronic pain). Following critical appraisal, ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Three studies reported a decrease in pain intensity as a result of the relaxation intervention, whilst only one study reported an improvement in health-related quality of life. Progressive muscle relaxation was the most commonly implemented method throughout, although its method of delivery differed between studies. There is little evidence for the use of relaxation as a stand-alone intervention for pain intensity and health-related quality of life for patients with musculoskeletal chronic non-malignant pain. More research is needed to determine its effectiveness.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Jeffrey S, McClelland T, Carus C et al (2016) Relaxation and chronic pain: A critical review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 23(6): 289-296.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.6.289Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.6.289