Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaufman, B.E.
dc.contributor.authorGall, Gregor
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-29T09:45:51Z
dc.date.available2016-04-29T09:45:51Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.identifier.citationKaufman BE and Gall G (2015) Advancing Industrial Relations Theory: An Analytical Synthesis of British-American and Pluralist-Radical Ideas. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations. 70(3): 407-431.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/8240
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractProminent writers in industrial relations (IR) have concluded the field is in significant decline, partly because of a failed theory base. The theory problem is deepened because other writers conclude developing a theory foundation for industrial relations is neither possible nor desirable. We believe advancing IR theory is both needed and possible, and take up the challenge in this paper. A long-standing problem in theorizing industrial relations has been the lack of agreement on the field’s core analytical construct. However, in the last two decades writers have increasingly agreed the field is centred on the employment relationship. Another long-standing problem is that writers have theorized industrial relations using different theoretical frames of reference, including pluralist and radical-Marxist; different disciplinary perspectives, such as economics, sociology, history, and politics; and from different national traditions, such as British, French, and American. In this paper, we seek to advance IR theory and better integrate paradigms and national traditions. We do this by developing an analytical explanation for four core features of the employment relationship—generation of an economic surplus, cooperation-conflict dialectic, indeterminate nature of the employment contract, and asymmetric authority and power in the firm—using an integrative mix of ideas and concepts from the pluralist and radical-Marxist streams presented in a multi-part diagram constructed with marginalist tools from conventional economics. The diagram includes central IR system components, such as labour market, hierarchical firm, macro-economy, and nation state government. The model is used to explain the four features of the employment relationship and derive implications for IR theory and practice. Examples include the diagrammatic representation of the size and distribution of the economic surplus, a new analytical representation of labour exploitation, identification of labour supply conditions that encourage, respectively, cooperation versus conflict, and demonstration of how inequality of bargaining power in labour markets contributes to macroeconomic stagnation and unemployment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1033404aren_US
dc.rights© 2015 Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval. Full-text reproduced in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.en_US
dc.subjectIndustrial relations theory; British-American industrial relations; Pluralist-radical; Employment relationship; Co-operation and conflict; Exploitationen_US
dc.titleAdvancing Industrial Relations Theory: An Analytical Synthesis of British-American and Pluralist-Radical Ideasen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionAccepted manuscripten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-25T12:46:00Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
gall_industrial_relations.pdf
Size:
471.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record