Asset-liability modelling and pension schemes: the application of robust optimization to USS
View/ Open
European_Journal_of_Finance.pdf (1.144Mb)
Download
Publication date
2017Keyword
Robust OptimizationPension Scheme
Asset-Liability Model
Sharpe Ratio
Sharpe-Tint
Bayes-Stein
Black-Litterman
Asset–Liability Management
Rights
© 2015 Taylor & Francis. This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Finance, 2015 available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2015.1071714Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
08/07/2015
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper uses a novel numerical optimization technique – robust optimization – that is well suited to solving the asset–liability management (ALM) problem for pension schemes. It requires the estimation of fewer stochastic parameters, reduces estimation risk and adopts a prudent approach to asset allocation. This study is the first to apply it to a real-world pension scheme, and the first ALM model of a pension scheme to maximize the Sharpe ratio. We disaggregate pension liabilities into three components – active members, deferred members and pensioners, and transform the optimal asset allocation into the scheme’s projected contribution rate. The robust optimization model is extended to include liabilities and used to derive optimal investment policies for the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), benchmarked against the Sharpe and Tint, Bayes–Stein and Black–Litterman models as well as the actual USS investment decisions. Over a 144-month out-of-sample period, robust optimization is superior to the four benchmarks across 20 performance criteria and has a remarkably stable asset allocation – essentially fix-mix. These conclusions are supported by six robustness checks.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Platanakis E and Sutcliffe C (2017) Asset–liability modelling and pension schemes: the application of robust optimization to USS. The European Journal of Finance. 23(4): 324-352.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2015.1071714Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2015.1071714