Quantum probabilities as DempsterShafer probabilities in the lattice of subspaces.
View/Open
JMP2014.pdf (261.4Kb)
Download
Publication date
201408Author
Vourdas, ApostolosRights
© 2014 AIP Publishing. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and AIP Publishing. The following article appeared in the Journal of Mathematical Physics and may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4891972.PeerReviewed
yes
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The orthocomplemented modular lattice of subspaces L[H(d)] , of a quantum system with ddimensional Hilbert space H(d), is considered. A generalized additivity relation which holds for Kolmogorov probabilities is violated by quantum probabilities in the full lattice L[H(d)] (it is only valid within the Boolean subalgebras of L[H(d)] ). This suggests the use of more general (than Kolmogorov) probability theories, and here the DempsterShafer probability theory is adopted. An operator D(H1,H2) , which quantifies deviations from Kolmogorov probability theory is introduced, and it is shown to be intimately related to the commutator of the projectors P(H1),P(H2) , to the subspaces H 1, H 2. As an application, it is shown that the proof of the inequalities of Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt for a system of two spin 1/2 particles is valid for Kolmogorov probabilities, but it is not valid for DempsterShafer probabilities. The violation of these inequalities in experiments supports the interpretation of quantum probabilities as DempsterShafer probabilities.Version
Accepted ManuscriptCitation
Vourdas A (2015) Quantum probabilities as DempsterShafer probabilities in the lattice of subspaces. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 55(8): 082107.Link to publisher’s version
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4891972Type
ArticleCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

Lower and upper probabilities in the distributive lattice of subsystemsVourdas, Apostolos (20140812)The set of subsystems ∑ (m) of a finite quantum system ∑(n) (with variables in Ζ(n)) together with logical connectives, is a distributive lattice. With regard to this lattice, the ℓ(m  ρn) = Tr (𝔓(m) ρn ) (where 𝔓(m) is the projector to ∑(m)) obeys a supermodularity inequality, and it is interpreted as a lower probability in the sense of the Dempster–Shafer theory, and not as a Kolmogorov probability. It is shown that the basic concepts of the Dempster–Shafer theory (lower and upper probabilities and the Dempster multivaluedness) are pertinent to the quantum formalism of finite systems.

Currents Induced on Wired I.T. Networks by Randomly Distributed Mobile Phones  A Computational Study.Excell, Peter S.; AbdAlhameed, Raed A.; Vaul, John A. (2006)The probability density and exceedance probability functions of the induced currents in a screened cable connecting two enclosures, resulting from the close. presence of single and multiple mobile phones working at 900 MHz, are investigated. The analysis of the problem is undertaken using the Method of Moments, but due to weak coupling, the impedance matrix was modified to reduce the memory and time requirements for the problem, to enable it to be executed multiple times. The empirical probability distribution functions (PDFs) and exceedance probabilities for the induced currents are presented. The form of the PDFs is seen to be quite well approximated by a lognormal distribution for a single source and by a Weibull distribution for multiple sources

A conditional view of causalityWeinert, Friedel (2007)Causal inference is perhaps the most important form of reasoning in the sciences. A panoply of disciplines, ranging from epidemiology to biology, from econometrics to physics, make use of probability and statistics to infer causal relationships. The social and health sciences analyse populationlevel data using statistical methods to infer average causal relations. In diagnosis of disease, probabilistic statements are based on populationlevel causal knowledge combined with knowledge of a particular person¿s symptoms. For the physical sciences, the SalmonDowe account develops an analysis of causation based on the notion of process and interaction. In artificial intelligence, the development of graphical methods has leant impetus to a probabilistic analysis of causality. The biological sciences use probabilistic methods to look for evolutionary causes of the state of a current species and to look for genetic causal factors. This variegated situation raises at least two fundamental philosophical issues: about the relation between causality and probability, and about the interpretation of probability in causal analysis. In this book we bring philosophers and scientists together to discuss the relation between causality and probability, and the applications of these concepts within the sciences.