Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVarghese, B.*
dc.contributor.authorMuthukumar, N.*
dc.contributor.authorBalasubramaniam, M.*
dc.contributor.authorScally, Andy J.*
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-16T14:13:13Z
dc.date.available2014-06-16T14:13:13Z
dc.date.issued2011-10
dc.identifier.citationVarghese B, Muthukumar N, Balasubramaniam M et al (2011) Reliability of measurements with digital radiographs - a myth. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 77(5): 622-625.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/6369
dc.descriptionNo
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of digital radiographs and hence their effectiveness in templating. The methodology involved a retrospective study of post operative radiographs of patients with hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Three observers made observations blinded to each other¿s measurements. A statistical analysis of the data highlights magnification varying from 6 to 31 percent. There is a statistically significant relationship between the size of the error (size measured on radiograph minus implant size, i.e. magnification) and the implant size (p = 0.005) but the percentage error (error/implant size x 100) is independent of implant size (p = 0.505). It is our impression that digital radiographs and templating on the digital radiographs should not be considered a precise process.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAccuracy
dc.subjectMeasuments
dc.subjectTemplating
dc.subject.otherDigital radiographs
dc.titleReliability of measurements with digital radiographs - a myth
dc.status.refereedNo
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repository
dc.openaccess.statusclosedAccess


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record