BRADFORD SCHOLARS

    • Sign in
    View Item 
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Health Studies
    • Health Studies Publications
    • View Item
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Health Studies
    • Health Studies Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Bradford ScholarsCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication Date

    My Account

    Sign in

    HELP

    Bradford Scholars FAQsCopyright Fact SheetPolicies Fact SheetDeposit Terms and ConditionsDigital Preservation Policy

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Participatory Video and Situated Ethics: Avoiding Disablism

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Capstick Participatory Video and Situated-3.pdf (513.6Kb)
    Download
    Publication date
    2012
    Author
    Capstick, Andrea
    Keyword
    Participatory video
    ; Disability
    ; Ethics
    ; Adaptation
    ; Dementia
    Rights
    © 2012 Rowan & Littlefield. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
    Peer-Reviewed
    No
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This chapter considers the adaptations which may need to be made to participatory video in order for it to be accessible to people whose marginalized status stems from a label of 'disability', whether this is physical, sensory or cognitive. To date there has been an ill fit between the emancipatory principles of participatory video, and the technical rationality (Schön, 1996) and hypercognitivity (Post, 2000) of its methods. Because participatory video is intended to enable marginalized, socially excluded and unheard groups of people to make films which reflect their own interests and concerns (Robertson & Shaw, 1997), adaptations to allow people with disabilities to take part would appear vital from an ethical point of view. Yet ethical issues in general do not appear to have been given sufficient consideration in the participatory video literature to date, and there is little evidence of engagement with emergent areas of debate such as the ethics of visual research (Prosser, 2008) and the importance of working in solidarity with people with reduced or fluctuating mental capacity (Nuffield Council for Bioethics, 2009).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10454/5567
    Version
    Accepted Manuscript
    Citation
    Capstick, A. (2012). Participatory Video and Situated Ethics: Avoiding Disablism. In: Milne, E-J., Mitchell, C. and de Lange, N. The Handbook of Participatory Video. Lanham MD: AltaMira Press.
    Link to publisher’s version
    http://www.rowmanlittlefield.com/ISBN/9780759121157
    Type
    Book chapter
    Collections
    Health Studies Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2019)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.