Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanterle, F.*
dc.contributor.authorLedda, P.*
dc.contributor.authorDebattista, K.*
dc.contributor.authorBloj, Marina*
dc.contributor.authorArtussi, A.*
dc.contributor.authorChalmers, A.*
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-03T12:11:49Z
dc.date.available2011-02-03T12:11:49Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationBanterle, F., Ledda, P., Debattista, K., Bloj, M., Artusi, A., and Chalmers, A. (2009) Psychophysical Evaluation of Inverse Tone Mapping Techniques. Computer Graphics Forum. Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 13-25.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/4771
dc.descriptionnoen_US
dc.description.abstractIn recent years inverse tone mapping techniques have been proposed for enhancing low-dynamic range (LDR) content for a high-dynamic range (HDR) experience on HDR displays, and for image based lighting. In this paper, we present a psychophysical study to evaluate the performance of inverse (reverse) tone mapping algorithms. Some of these techniques are computationally expensive because they need to resolve quantization problems that can occur when expanding an LDR image. Even if they can be implemented efficiently on hardware, the computational cost can still be high. An alternative is to utilize less complex operators; although these may suffer in terms of accuracy. Our study investigates, firstly, if a high level of complexity is needed for inverse tone mapping and, secondly, if a correlation exists between image content and quality. Two main applications have been considered: visualization on an HDR monitor and image-based lighting.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01176.xen_US
dc.subjectInverse Tone Mappingen_US
dc.subjectHigh dynamic range imagingen_US
dc.subjectPsychophysical evaluationen_US
dc.titleA Psychophysical Evaluation of Inverse Tone Mapping Techniques.en_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record