Exporting knitted apparel. A study of the determinants of exporting performance in the UK knitted apparel sector.
2.2.CHAPTER 1.xls (24.5Kb)Download
2.3.CHAPTER 1.xls (25.5Kb)Download
4. 0. CHAPTER 3.pdf (27.83Kb)Download
4.1.CHAPTER 3.pdf (156.5Kb)Download
5.1.CHAPTER 4.pdf (189.1Kb)Download
6.0.CHAPTER 5.pdf (15.38Kb)Download
6.1.CHAPTER 5.pdf (129.4Kb)Download
7.0.CHAPTER 6.pdf (16.64Kb)Download
7.1.CHAPTER 6.pdf (117.3Kb)Download
7.3.CHAPTER 6.xls (23.5Kb)Download
7.4.CHAPTER 6.jpg (295.0Kb)Download
7.5.CHAPTER 6.pdf (32.91Kb)Download
8.0.CHAPTER 7.pdf (25.15Kb)Download
8.1.CHAPTER 7.pdf (123.3Kb)Download
9.0.Annex 1.pdf (77.22Kb)Download
10.0 ANNEX 2.pdf (25.83Kb)Download
11.0 ANNEX 3.pdf (105.7Kb)Download
12.0.ANNEX 4..xls (46Kb)Download
12.1.ANNEX 4.xls (24Kb)Download
13.0.Annex 5.pdf (15.90Kb)Download
14.0.Annex 6.xls (91Kb)Download
16.0..Annex 8.xls (25.5Kb)Download
AuthorMurphy, Owen Patrick
KeywordKnitted apparel industry, UK
Export performance model
Determinants of export
Knitted garments exports
Stratified random sample survey
The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
InstitutionUniversity of Bradford
DepartmentSchool of Engineering, Design and Technology
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractAs the globalisation process accelerates there is a growing need for individual countries to understand the bases for effective performance in international trade. Because it makes up such a large share of world trade, it is especially important to understand what determines effectiveness in exporting. Despite much empirical research, especially over recent decades, the state of knowledge on this topic remains fragmented, unclear and unsatisfactory. The motivation for the present study was therefore twofold: dissatisfaction with the present state of knowledge in this vital area and the importance to the UK economy of improving its export performance in a world of increasing competition. Its aim was to contribute to the resolution of both. In addition to finding what appeared to be quite serious methodological problems in a group of earlier studies, our review of the literature indicated that the best prospects for identifying the determinants of effective exporting were to be found, not at national or sectoral level but at that of the individual firm. Accordingly, an empirical survey research project was developed. To minimise unquantifiable inter-sectoral variability, it was focused on a single sector of industry. For a range of reasons, including the limited amount of information available about its current export activity and prospects, the UK knitted apparel industry was chosen.. Special care having been taken to assemble the fullest possible sampling frame and to develop a suitable instrument (which included an export performance model), a mail survey in the form of a stratified random sample of exporting UK manufacturers of knitted apparel was carried through from late 2000. Persistent follow-up by mail and telephone generated a response rate of 70 per cent, comprising close to half of the sampling frame, that was representative of all company size bands, levels of exporting and products. The overall quality of the responses was good; tests of non-response did not find any indications of non-response bias. Data analysis, designed to test thoroughly our 10 export-determinants hypotheses, relied primarily on Pearsonian correlation at the bivariate level then sequentially on Multiple Regression Analysis, Canonical Correlation Analysis and Partial Least Squares. A perhaps slightly novel aspect of the research was that it was not solely cross-sectional in format; a longitudinal element was provided by drawing on the researcher¿s earlier surveys ; and a panel element by following-up, in 2007, the main 2000 field survey. Where possible, these data were drawn upon in the analysis and interpretation. There did not appear to be any conflict between the three multivariate techniques employed and indeed their findings were not dissimilar. The outcome of the data analysis was to uphold, to varying degrees, most of our hypotheses about the determinants of effective/ or successful exporting. Those that did not find support were three: firm size, product adaptation, and price determination method. Most strongly supported as determinants were promotional intensity, serving many markets and visits to trade fairs/ exhibitions; others which were statistically significant, included management commitment, special staff skills and the use of Commission Agents. While the conclusions must remain a bit tentative they are encouraging.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The effect of export market-oriented culture on export performance: Evidence from a Sub-Saharan African economyOlabode, Oluwaseun E.; Adeola, O.; Assadinia, S. (2018-07)Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine how export learning capability and export environmental turbulence serve as mechanisms and boundary conditions to link export market-oriented culture to export performance. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative approach was undertaken to analyse longitudinal data of 249 small- and medium-sized exporting firms in Nigeria, a Sub-Saharan African economy. Findings: Four major findings emerged from the study. First, export market-oriented culture positively influences export performance. Second, possessing an export market-oriented culture results in the development of high export learning capabilities. Third, export learning capability mediates the relationship between export market-oriented culture and export performance. Fourth, increases in export environment turbulence weaken the positive effect of export learning capability on export performance. Research limitations/implications: This study does not investigate moderating effects which might affect the relationship between export market-oriented culture and export learning capability as this was beyond the scope of this study. Originality/value: This study looks at developing economy environment as a unique context to examine the direct, mediating, and moderating effects of export market-oriented culture on export performance.
The Economic Costs and Benefits of UK Defence Exports.Chalmers, Malcolm G.; Davies, N.; Hartley, K.; Wilkinson, C. (2009-11-25)This study examines the economic costs and benefits to the UK of a 50 per cent cut in UK defence exports from the average level of 1998 and 1999. The net impact on the government budget is estimated to he an ongoing loss of between around L40 million and L100 million a year: around 0.2-0.4 per cent of the total UK defence budget. In addition, there is estimated to be a one-off net adjustment cost, spread over five years, of between L0.9 billion and L1.4 billion. A further more speculative adjustment cost (estimated at around L1.1billion) could result if the loss of income associated with the `terms-of-trade' effect were also included. In terms of the wider debate about defence about defence exports, the results of this study suggest first that the economic effects of the reduction in defence exports are relatively small and largely one-off, and secondly that the balance of arguments about UK defence exports should be determined mainly by non-economic factors.
The effect of government support on bureaucracy, COVID-19 resilience and export intensity: Evidence from North AfricaOnjewu, A.E.; Olan, F.; Nyuur, Richard B.; Paul, S.; Nguyen, H.T.T. (2023-02)The literature on the imperativeness of government support for firm survival since the onset of COVID-19 is vast, but scholars have scarcely considered the impact of such assistance on managers' time, nor the extent to which support measures induce resilience and export activity. Accordingly, this study assesses the impact of government support on (1) bureaucracy and (2) resilience using data from 535 Moroccan SMEs. It further evaluates the influence of resilience on direct versus indirect exports, and espouses the institutional voids, resource-based and strategy-creation view to explain the associations through a contingency lens. The results demonstrate that (1) government support increases bureaucracy which, (2) surprisingly triggers and enhances resilience. Furthermore, (3) resilience has a positive impact on direct exports but (4) adversely affects indirect exports. Theoretically, the findings acquiesce extant calls for measurement specificity in export performance. Practically, stakeholders' attention is drawn to the value of managers' time well spent.