BRADFORD SCHOLARS

    • Sign in
    View Item 
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Engineering and Digital Technology
    • Engineering and Digital Technology Publications
    • View Item
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Engineering and Digital Technology
    • Engineering and Digital Technology Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Bradford ScholarsCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication Date

    My Account

    Sign in

    HELP

    Bradford Scholars FAQsCopyright Fact SheetPolicies Fact SheetDeposit Terms and ConditionsDigital Preservation Policy

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Entrenched Views or Insufficient Science? Contested Causes and Solutions of Water Allocation: Insights from the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Publication date
    2004
    Author
    Franks, Tom R.
    Lankford, B.
    Van Koppen, B.
    Mahoo, H.
    Keyword
    River Basin Management
    Environmental Change
    Tanzania
    Irrigation
    Science
    Policy
    Institutions
    Peer-Reviewed
    Yes
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The case study describes large-scale environmental change related to, and recent responses associated with, growing water scarcity in the Usangu Plains, a catchment of the Great Ruaha River in south-west Tanzania. The analysis uses outputs from two recent projects to critically examine various theories of environmental change and the `fit¿ of new river basin management strategies to the problems found, arguing that various perspectives are worryingly at odds with each other. We find that the investigators of the two projects presented a reasonable and sufficient case of the causes of water scarcity. Yet despite efforts to disseminate scientific findings, different stakeholder groups did not agree with this case. This, we believe, was due to three combined factors; firstly highly entrenched views existed that were also based on quasi-scientific reasoning; secondly, the projects¿ deliberations to date, in acknowledging their own uncertainty, were not assertive enough in ascribing causation to the various processes of change; thirdly, policy-uptake was not sufficiently managed by the scientists involved. We conclude that this complexity of the science¿policy interface is a feature of integrated water resources management (IWRM) and that the norms of scientific uncertainty in the face of competing theories (held by their protagonists with greater certainty) obliges scientists to take a more active role in sensitively managing the advice-to-policy process in order to improve management of water within river basins. Thus, the paper argues, the nature of integrated water resources management is one of `action research¿ to move towards an improved understanding of change, and of `action policy-advising¿ to draw policy-makers into a cycle of considered decision-making.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4110
    Version
    No full-text available in the repository
    Citation
    Franks, T.R., Lankford, B., van Koppen, B. and Mahoo, H. (2004). Entrenched Views or Insufficient Science? Contested Causes and Solutions of Water Allocation: Insights from the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania. Agricultural Water Management. Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 135-153.
    Link to publisher’s version
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.04.005
    Type
    Article
    Collections
    Engineering and Digital Technology Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.