Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBall, N.
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-16T15:16:25Z
dc.date.available2009-11-16T15:16:25Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationBall, N., [in association with] Bradford University, Channel Research Ltd, PARC & Associated Consultants (2004). Evaluation of the Conflict Prevention Pools: The Security Sector Reform Strategy. London: DFID. Evaluation report (EV 647) Thematic Case Study 1.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/3937
dc.descriptionyesen
dc.description.abstractP5. The evaluation was undertaken by Bradford University, Channel Research Ltd, the PARC & Associated Consultants. The GCPP Security Sector Reform (SSR) case study was carried out by Ms Nicole Ball who has conducted extensive fieldwork on SSR in a number of countries. This study was carried out through review of relevant documents, including the reports of geographic case studies undertaken for the evaluation, and interview of UK-based officials involved in SSR work. The UK-based interviews focused on several categories of stakeholders: members of the SSR Strategy Steering Group; members of the SSR Policy Committee; representatives of three main SSR Strategy instruments (DAT, GFN, Defence Diplomacy); representatives of the GCPP and ACPP; and officials currently working on or recently working on key geographic desks (Balkans, Indonesia, Uganda). P7. The GCPP SSR Case Study is one of six studies undertaken within the framework of the evaluation of the Conflict Prevention Pools. In accordance with the Terms of Reference (ToRs) and the Inception Report, the Evaluation placed maximum emphasis on the macro level: the policy processes in Whitehall by which decisions on allocations are made and implemented by the CPPs. Considerable attention has also been placed on the meso level: the degree to which CPP policies and activities in a given conflict, or given sector of conflict prevention policy such as SSR, form part of a coherent package of direct interventions by the international community and local actors to the problems of preventing large scale deadly conflicts. The micro-level of analysis (review of specific projects) confines itself largely to the way in which projects impact on the meso and macro levels. The Evaluation has not analysed systematically whether specific projects funded by the CPPs have been well managed and whether they have achieved their specific project goals. Single projects have been analysed to the extent that they reflect on the macro and meso levels. P8. The main findings of the evaluation, reflected in this Synthesis Report, are that the CPPs are doing significant work funding worthwhile activities that make positive contributions to effective conflict prevention, although it is far too early in the day to assess impact. The progress achieved through the CPP mechanisms is significant enough to justify their continuation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDepartment for International Developmenten
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttp://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/cics/publications/conflict_prevention/case_studies/en
dc.rights© Crown copyright 2004. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.en
dc.subjectConflict Prevention Poolsen
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectSecurity Sector Reformen
dc.titleEvaluation of the Conflict Prevention Pools: The Security Sector Reform Strategy.en
dc.status.refereedYesen
dc.typeReporten
dc.type.versionpublished version paperen
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-18T12:52:04Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
security_sector_reform_(EV647).pdf
Size:
234.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record