Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoodhand, J.*
dc.contributor.authorBergne, P.*
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-16T11:58:10Z
dc.date.available2009-11-16T11:58:10Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationGoodhand, J. and Bergne, P. [in association with] Bradford University, Channel Research Ltd, PARC & Associated Consultants (2004). Evaluation of the Conflict Prevention Pools: Afghanistan. London: DFID. Evaluation report (EV 647) Country Case Study 2.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/3923
dc.descriptionyesen
dc.description.abstractThe evaluation was undertaken by Bradford University, Channel Research Ltd, the PARC & Associated Consultants. The Afghanistan Case study was carried out by Mr Jonathan Goodhand with Mr Paul Bergne. The work was conducted through fieldwork in Afghanistan (Kabul and Malaria Shari) where the team conducted interviews with a range of officials including staff from UK Embassy, GCPP projects, the Mazar Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) and UN, Afghan Government and NGO officials. The fieldwork was supplemented by further interviews in London and a review of the relevant literature and project documents.P7. The Afghanistan Case Study is one of six studies undertaken within the framework of the evaluation of the Conflict Prevention Pools. In accordance with the Terms of Reference (ToRs) and the Inception Report, the Evaluation placed maximum emphasis on the macro level: the policy processes in Whitehall by which decisions on allocations are made and implemented by the CPPs. Considerable attention has also been placed on the meson level: the degree to which CPP policies and activities in a given conflict form part of a coherent package of direct interventions by the international community and local actors to the problems of particular large scale deadly conflicts or potential conflicts. The microlevel of analysis (review of specific projects) confines itself largely to the way in which projects impact on the meson and macro levels. The Evaluation has not analysed systematically whether specific projects funded by the CPPs have been well managed and whether they have achieved their specific project goals. Single projects have been analysed to the extent that they reflect on the macro and meson levels. P8. The main findings of the evaluation, reflected in this Synthesis Report, are that the CPPs are doing significant work funding worthwhile activities that make positive contributions to effective conflict prevention, although it is far too early in the day to assess impact. The progress achieved through the CPP mechanisms is significant enough to justify their continuation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDepartment for International Development.en
dc.rights© Crown copyright 2004. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.en
dc.subjectConflict Prevention Poolsen
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectAfghanistanen
dc.titleEvaluation of the Conflict Prevention Pools: Afghanistan.en
dc.status.refereedYesen
dc.typeReporten
dc.type.versionpublished version paperen
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-18T19:15:54Z
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/cics/publications/conflict_prevention/case_studies/


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Afghanistan_(EV647).pdf
Size:
254.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record