Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCowburn, I. Malcolm*
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-23T13:56:20Z
dc.date.available2009-09-23T13:56:20Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationCowburn, M. (2005). Confidentiality and public protection: Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research with adult male sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49-64.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/3508
dc.descriptionNoen
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers the ethical tensions present when engaging in in-depth interviews with convicted sex offenders. Many of the issues described below are similar to those found in other sensitive areas of research. However, confidentiality and public protection are matters that require detailed consideration when the desire to know more about men who have committed serious and harmful offences is set against the possibility of a researcher not disclosing previously unknown sensitive information that relates to the risk of someone being harmed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSexualityen
dc.subjectPhysical & Sexual Abuse in Children & Adolescentsen
dc.subjectPhysical & Sexual Abuse in Adultsen
dc.subjectAggression in Adultsen
dc.subjectChild Care & Child Protection;en
dc.subjectCriminology & Delinquencyen
dc.subjectEthics & Legal issues in Mental Healthen
dc.subjectCondidentialityen
dc.titleConfidentiality and public protection: Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research with adult male sex offenders.en
dc.status.refereedYesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.versionnot applicable paperen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13552600512331298284


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record