Policy Failure and Petroleum Predation: The economics of civil war debate viewed from the `war zone'.
Abstract
The analysis of armed conflict in the post Cold War era has been profoundly influenced by neoclassical economists. Statistical approaches have generated important propositions, but there is a danger when these feed into policy prescriptions. This paper first compares the economics of civil war literature with the social movement literature which has also tried to explain collective action problems. It argues that the latter has a much more sophisticated set of conceptual tools, enriched by empirical study. The paper then uses the case of multipolar militarization in oil-rich Casanare, Colombia, to demonstrate complexity and contingency in civil war trajectories. State policy failure and civil actors can be an important source of explanation alongside the economic agendas of armed actors.Version
published version paperCitation
Pearce, J.V. (2005). Policy Failure and Petroleum Predation: The economics of civil war debate viewed from the `war zone'. Government and Opposition. Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 152-180.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2005.00148.xType
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2005.00148.x