Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHickson, David J.*
dc.contributor.authorWilson, D.C.*
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Susan J.*
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-28T07:10:37Z
dc.date.available2009-07-28T07:10:37Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationHicson, D., Wilson, D.C. and Miller, S.J. (2003). Planned or prioritized? Two options in managing the implementation of strategic decisions. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 1803-1836.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/3157
dc.descriptionNo
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents findings from a study of 55 cases of decision implementation. The research identifies a number of features that characterize the way implementation is managed which appear to enhance the chance of success. Analysis reveals patterns in the data indicating that these features fall into two groupings, giving rise to two distinct approaches to implementation management. These are termed the Experience-based approach and the Readiness-based approach from the initial conditions which give rise to each. Although following either approach may enhance decision performance, the greatest success is associated with a dual approach. Implementations that follow neither are generally less successful. A theory of implementation management is postulated, comprising a Planned Option and a Prioritized Option.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectDecision implementation
dc.subjectLeadership
dc.subjectImplementation management
dc.subjectReadiness-based approach
dc.subjectExperience-based approach
dc.titlePlanned or prioritized? Two options in managing the implementation of strategic decisionsen
dc.status.refereedYes
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repository
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00401
dc.openaccess.statusclosedAccess


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record