Evidence-based management: The very idea
dc.contributor.author | Learmonth, M. | * |
dc.contributor.author | Harding, Nancy H. | * |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-07-21T07:25:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-07-21T07:25:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Learmonth M and Harding NH (2006) Evidence-based management: The very idea. Public Administration. 84(2): 245-266. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10454/3075 | |
dc.description | No | |
dc.description.abstract | This essay critically evaluates the recent phenomenon of `evidence-based management' in public services that is especially prominent in health care. We suggest that the current approach, broadly informed by evidence-based health care, is misguided given the deeply contested nature of `evidence' within the discipline of management studies. We argue that its growing popularity in spite of the theoretical problems it faces can be understood primarily as a function of the interests served by the universalization of certain forms of managerialist `evidence' rather than any contribution to organizational effectiveness. Indeed, in a reading informed by the work of French geographer Henri Lefebvre, we suggest that in the long term the project is likely to inhibit rather than encourage a fuller understanding of the nature of public services. We conclude with a call for forms of organizational research that the current preoccupations of the evidence-based project marginalize if not write out altogether. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Evidence-based management | |
dc.subject | Health care | |
dc.subject | Public services | |
dc.title | Evidence-based management: The very idea | en |
dc.status.refereed | Yes | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.type.version | No full-text in the repository | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00001.x | |
dc.openaccess.status | closedAccess |