A process evaluation of the NIDUS-Professional dementia training intervention for UK homecare workers
View/ Open
kelleher_et_al_2024.pdf (1008.Kb)
Download
Publication date
2024-05-25Author
Kelleher, Daniel
Windle, Karen
Randell, Rebecca

Lord, Kathryn
Duffy, L.
Akhtar, Amirah
Budgett, J.
Zabihi, S.
Rapaport, P.
Lee, T.
Barber, J.
Orgeta, V.
Manthorpe, J.
Walters, K.
Rockwood, K.
Dow, B.
Hoe, J.
Banerjee, S.
Cooper, C.
Rights
(c) 2024 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
2024-05-25
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Introduction This process evaluation was conducted in parallel to the randomised controlled feasibility trial of NIDUS-Professional, a manualised remote dementia training intervention for homecare workers (HCWs), delivered alongside an individualised intervention for clients living with dementia and their family carers (NIDUS-Family). The process evaluation reports on: (i) intervention reach, dose and fidelity; (ii) contexts influencing agency engagement and (iii) alignment of findings with theoretical assumptions about how the intervention might produce change. Methods We report proportions of eligible HCWs receiving any intervention (reach), number of sessions attended (dose; attending ≥4/6 main sessions was predefined as adhering), intervention fidelity and adherence of clients and carers to NIDUS-Family (attending all 6–8 planned sessions). We interviewed HCWs, managers, family carers and facilitators. We integrated and thematically analysed, at the homecare agency level, qualitative interview and intervention recording data. Results 32/141 (23%) of eligible HCWs and 7/42 (17%) of family carers received any intervention; most who did adhered to the intervention (89% and 71%). Intervention fidelity was high. We analysed interviews with 20/44 HCWs, 3/4 managers and 3/7 family carers, as well as intervention recordings involving 32/44 HCWs. All agencies reported structural challenges in supporting intervention delivery. Agencies with greater management buy-in had higher dose and reach. HCWs valued NIDUS-Professional for enabling group reflection and peer support, providing practical, actionable care strategies and increasing their confidence as practitioners. Conclusion NIDUS-Professional was valued by HCWs. Agency management, culture and priorities were key barriers to implementation; we discuss how to address these in a future trial.Version
Published versionCitation
Kelleher D, Windle K, Randell R et al (2024) A process evaluation of the NIDUS-Professional dementia training intervention for UK homecare workers. Age and Ageing. 53(5): afae109.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae109Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae109