Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPearce, Jenny V.
dc.contributor.advisorBroadhead, Lee-Anne
dc.contributor.authorBühler, Ute
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T09:47:20Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T09:47:20Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/19895
dc.description.abstractThe Ethics of Liberation in the Age of Globalisation and Exclusion by the Latin American philosopher Enrique Dussel aims to be 'a day to day ethics, starting from and in favour of the immense majorities of humanity excluded from globalisation, in the historic 'nonnality' that is presently prevalent' 1 • Dussel's Ethics is based around the material principle of 'the production, reproduction and development of life', the formal discursive principle that decision-making processes should be open to all those affected by them, and the principle of (ethical and empirical) feasibility. Ethical critique and liberatory practice, Dussel argues, should start from and be carried out by the 'victims' of the partial or non-realisation of these principles. Nevertheless, the discussion of Dussel's philosophy has tended to stay at the philosophical level. This thesis moves beyond this discussion by relating the universal principles Dussel proposes to the concrete experiences of two movements that are insisting on universalistic normative ideas in the context of globalisation and eicclusion: The Zapatistas in Mexico and the Narmada Bachao Andolan (Save Narmada Movement - NBA) in India. My study of these concrete struggles to challenge victimisation reveals both the similarities between their nonnative content and Dussel's principles and the complex questions that arise in attempts to realise these normative principles precisely in the situations of domination and exclusion that Dussel takes as his starting-point. While some of these questions constitute a challenge to rethink aspects of the philosophical debate, others can only legitimately be answered by those who participate in practical attempts to challenge material and discursive exclusion. From this background, the relationship between philosophy and practice becomes an important question in itself.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trusten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>.eng
dc.subjectEthics of Liberationen_US
dc.subjectEnrique Dusselen_US
dc.subjectZapatistasen_US
dc.subjectNarmada Bachao Andolanen_US
dc.subjectEthical critiqueen_US
dc.subjectDiscourse ethicsen_US
dc.subjectLiberatory politicsen_US
dc.subjectDignityen_US
dc.subjectSocial movementsen_US
dc.subjectLatin American philosophyen_US
dc.titleJust Philosophy, Just Practice? An Exploration of Enrique Dussel's Ethics of Liberation in Relation to the Normative Dimension of Two Movements Against Globalisation and Exclusionen_US
dc.type.qualificationleveldoctoralen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Bradfordeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Peace Studiesen_US
dc.typeThesiseng
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_US
dc.date.awarded2000
refterms.dateFOA2024-05-07T09:47:20Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Just Philosophy Just Practice - ...
Size:
41.54Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
PhD Thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record