The benefits and complexities of integrating mixed method findings using the Pillar Integration Process: A workplace health intervention case study
View/ Open
Hall_&_Mansfield_JMMR.pdf (381.7Kb)
Download
Publication date
2023Rights
© The Author(s) 2023. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccess
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Pillar Integration Process was developed to facilitate integration of mixed method data, but there is limited historical application of this approach in complex intervention evaluation. To test the applicability of the technique, this paper presents two case studies examining the efficacy of a workplace intervention. The research included a pilot RCT and process evaluation. The case studies illustrate the benefits of applying the Pillar Integration Process to elicit a comprehensive understanding of intervention efficacy and to design better interventions. This paper contributes to the mixed methods research by advancing the technique through considering inherent philosophical assumptions, and evidencing the value of integrating methods within, as well as across, “qualitative” and “quantitative” categories.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Hall J and Mansfield L (2023) The benefits and complexities of integrating mixed method findings using the Pillar Integration Process: A workplace health intervention case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Accepted for Publication.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231196287Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231196287