Reflections from an insider researcher ‘doing’ feminist participatory action research to co-produce a research agenda with British Pakistani women; a seldom heard group
View/ Open
iqbal_et_al_2023.pdf (734.2Kb)
Download
Publication date
2023-12Keyword
Research Development Fund Publication Prize AwardFeminist participatory action research
British Pakistani women
Seldom heard
Obesity research agenda
Research priority setting
Insider researcher
Co-production
Rights
(c) 2023 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
2023-07-12
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Participation of community stakeholders in health research priority setting is an emerging trend. Despite this, the involvement of marginalised groups in research prioritisation is limited and where they are involved, sample sizes are small, where individuals are merely consulted with, rather than coproducing the research agenda. Without addressing power dynamics inherent in research prioritisation with marginalised groups, their engagement in the research process can be tokenistic and the resulting research agenda unreflective of their needs. This article, therefore, aims to generate knowledge on how feminist participatory action research was used to co-produce an obesity research agenda with British Pakistani women, a seldom heard population, living in deprived areas. The methodology enabled Pakistani women to be involved in all stages of the project, culminating in the co-production of an obesity research agenda that accurately reflects their unmet needs. Women’s engagement in the project led to their increased confidence, the formation of relationships that lasted beyond the research project, improvements to their lifestyles, and engagement in further research. Feminist participatory action research may be used by researchers as a guiding methodology due to its ability to improve women’s lives and develop research agendas for women’s health.Version
Published versionCitation
Iqbal H, West J, Haith-Cooper M et al (2023) Reflections from an insider researcher "doing" feminist participatory action research to co-produce a research agenda with British Pakistani women; a seldom heard group. Action Research. 21(4): 456-471.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231191854Type
ArticleNotes
Research Development Fund Publication Prize Award winner, Jul 2023.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231191854
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A Comparative Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods and a Justification for Adopting Mixed Methods in Social Research.Haq, Muhibul (2015)The aim of this review is to create awareness about uses of available social research methods and to provide a guideline in adopting appropriate methods specifically in qualitative and mixed methods research genre. Based on the review of contemporary social research methods I believe that mixed methods research produces more accurate results than relying on either qualitative or quantitative methods alone in explaining complex social issues. This paper contributes to the methodological literature in two areas. First, create awareness among social researchers and students about the available research methods in order to help them to adopt suitable research designs in addressing their particular research questions. Second, encourage scholars from all disciplines to theorize further, especially in the field of mixed methods, and engage in a dialogue in order to improve methodological appropriateness for future research in social sciences.
-
Relationally Reflexive Practice: A Generative Approach to Theory Development in Qualitative ResearchHibbert, P.; Sillince, J.; Diefenbach, T.; Cunliffe, Ann L. (2014)In this article we explain how the development of new organization theory faces several mutually reinforcing problems, which collectively suppress generative debate and the creation of new and alternative theories. We argue that to overcome these problems, researchers should adopt relationally reflexive practices. This does not lead to an alternative method but instead informs how methods are applied. Specifically, we advocate a stance toward the application of qualitative methods that legitimizes insights from the situated life-with-others of the researcher. We argue that this stance can improve our abilities for generative theorizing in the field of management and organization studies.
-
Qualitative data analysis using a dialogical approachSullivan, Paul W. (2012)