Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPownall, M.
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, F.
dc.contributor.authorKönig, L.M.
dc.contributor.authorSlack, H.R.
dc.contributor.authorEvans, T.R.
dc.contributor.authorFlack, Z.
dc.contributor.authorGrinschgl, S.
dc.contributor.authorElsherif, M.M.
dc.contributor.authorGilligan-Lee, K.A.
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, C.M.F.
dc.contributor.authorGjoneska, B.
dc.contributor.authorKalandadze, T.
dc.contributor.authorButton, K.
dc.contributor.authorAshcroft-Jones, S.
dc.contributor.authorTerry, J.
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak-Aydemir, N.
dc.contributor.authorDěchtěrenko, F.
dc.contributor.authorAlzahawi, S.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, B.J.
dc.contributor.authorPittelkow, M.-M.
dc.contributor.authorRiedl, L.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, K.
dc.contributor.authorPennington, C.R.
dc.contributor.authorShaw, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorLüke, T.
dc.contributor.authorMakel, M.C.
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, H.
dc.contributor.authorZaneva, M.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, D.
dc.contributor.authorVerheyen, S.
dc.contributor.authorCox, D.
dc.contributor.authorMattschey, J.
dc.contributor.authorGallagher-Mitchell, T.
dc.contributor.authorBranney, Peter
dc.contributor.authorWeisberg, Y.
dc.contributor.authorIzydorczak, K.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hoorie, A.H.
dc.contributor.authorCreaven, A.-M.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, S.L.K.
dc.contributor.authorKrautter, K.
dc.contributor.authorMatvienko-Sikar, K.
dc.contributor.authorWestwood, S.J.
dc.contributor.authorArriaga, P.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, M.
dc.contributor.authorBaum, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorWingen, T.
dc.contributor.authorRoss, R.M.
dc.contributor.authorO'Mahony, A.
dc.contributor.authorBochynska, A.
dc.contributor.authorJamieson, M.
dc.contributor.authorTromp, M.V.
dc.contributor.authorYeung, S.K.
dc.contributor.authorVasilev, M.R.
dc.contributor.authorGourdon-Kanhukamwe, A.
dc.contributor.authorMicheli, L.
dc.contributor.authorKonkol, M.
dc.contributor.authorMoreau, D.
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, J.E.
dc.contributor.authorClark, K.
dc.contributor.authorBrekelmans, G.
dc.contributor.authorGkinopoulos, T.
dc.contributor.authorTyler, S.L.
dc.contributor.authorRöer, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorIlchovska, Z.G.
dc.contributor.authorMadan, C.R.
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, O.
dc.contributor.authorIley, B.J.
dc.contributor.authorGuay, S.
dc.contributor.authorSladekova, M.
dc.contributor.authorSadhwani, S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T15:49:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-19T10:46:28Z
dc.date.available2023-07-12T15:49:58Z
dc.date.available2023-07-19T10:46:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-17
dc.identifier.citationPownall M, Azevedo F, König LM et al (2023) Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes. Royal Society Open Science. 10(5): 221255.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/19519
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students' understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUKRI/ESRC rapid call grant, ealth Research Board Applying Researchinto Policy and Practice Fellowship, John Templeton Foundation (grant ID: 62631), Northern Ireland Department for the Economy Research Studentshipen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights(c) 2023 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_US
dc.subjectOpen scholarshipen_US
dc.subjectTeachingen_US
dc.subjectOpen Scienceen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectPedagogyen_US
dc.subjectOpen researchen_US
dc.titleTeaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes.en_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.rights.licenseCC-BYen_US
dc.date.updated2023-07-12T15:50:01Z
refterms.dateFOA2023-07-19T10:46:58Z
dc.openaccess.statusopenAccessen_US
dc.date.accepted2023-04-26


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Openandreproduciblescholarship ...
Size:
656.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
pownall_et_al_2023

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record