Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKing, H.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, B.
dc.contributor.authorTreanor, D.
dc.contributor.authorRandell, Rebecca
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T14:35:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T11:23:34Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T14:35:57Z
dc.date.available2023-06-27T11:23:34Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.identifier.citationKing H, Williams B, Treanor D et al (2023) How, for whom, and in what contexts will artificial intelligence be adopted in pathology? A realist interview study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 30(3): 529-538.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/19485
dc.descriptionYes
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing interest in using artificial intelligence (AI) in pathology to improve accuracy and efficiency. Studies of clinicians' perceptions of AI have found only moderate acceptability, suggesting further research is needed regarding integration into clinical practice. This study aimed to explore stakeholders' theories concerning how and in what contexts AI is likely to become integrated into pathology. Materials and Methods: A literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study with 20 pathologists and 5 pathology trainees. Questions sought to elicit whether, and in what ways, the tentative theories fitted with interviewees' perceptions and experiences. Analysis focused on identifying the contextual factors that may support or constrain uptake of AI in pathology. Results: Interviews highlighted the importance of trust in AI, with interviewees emphasizing evaluation and the opportunity for pathologists to become familiar with AI as means for establishing trust. Interviewees expressed a desire to be involved in design and implementation of AI tools, to ensure such tools address pressing needs, but needs vary by subspecialty. Workflow integration is desired but whether AI tools should work automatically will vary according to the task and the context. Conclusions: It must not be assumed that AI tools that provide benefit in one subspecialty will provide benefit in others. Pathologists should be involved in the decision to introduce AI, with opportunity to assess strengths and weaknesses. Further research is needed concerning the evidence required to satisfy pathologists regarding the benefits of AI.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was undertaken as part of the National Pathology Imaging Co-operative. National Pathology Imaging Co-operative, NPIC (Project no. 104687) is supported by a £50m investment from the Data to Early Diagnosis and Precision Medicine strand of the government’s Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund, managed and delivered by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectPathology
dc.subjectImplementation
dc.subjectRealist evaluation
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.titleHow, for whom, and in what contexts will artificial intelligence be adopted in pathology? A realist interview study
dc.status.refereedYes
dc.date.Accepted2022-12-09
dc.date.application2022-12-24
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.versionPublished version
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac254
dc.rights.licenseCC-BY
dc.date.updated2023-06-15T14:35:58Z
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-27T11:24:20Z
dc.openaccess.statusopenAccess


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Randell_et_al_JAMIA.pdf
Size:
281.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
ImplementationofAIinpathologyR ...
Size:
111.1Kb
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007
Description:
To keep suppressed

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record