BRADFORD SCHOLARS

    • Sign in
    View Item 
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Engineering and Informatics
    • Engineering and Informatics Publications
    • View Item
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Engineering and Informatics
    • Engineering and Informatics Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Bradford ScholarsCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication Date

    My Account

    Sign in

    HELP

    Bradford Scholars FAQsCopyright Fact SheetPolicies Fact SheetDeposit Terms and ConditionsDigital Preservation Policy

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Wave induced silty seabed response around a trenched pipeline

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Publication date
    2022-02
    End of Embargo
    2023-01-11
    Author
    Gao, Y.
    Zhang, J.
    Tong, L.
    Guo, Yakun
    Lam, Dennis
    Keyword
    Soil response
    Residual pore pressure
    Offshore pipeline
    Backfill soil
    Soil liquefaction
    Rights
    © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
    Peer-Reviewed
    Yes
    Open Access status
    embargoedAccess
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Most previous studies on seabed liquefaction around offshore pipelines focused on investigating the wave-induced pore pressure variation in sandy seabed, while limited studies have been conducted for silty seabed. In this study, laboratory experiments are conducted to investigate wave-induced pore pressure within silty bed around the buried or partially/fully backfilled pipeline. Results show that residual pore pressure is the dominant factor that causes the liquefaction in silty soil. For buried pipeline, liquefaction first occurs at the pipeline bottom, then propagates upwards and downwards vertically. Comparing with the buried pipeline, the liquefaction potential is reduced when the pipeline is placed in a trench. To protect pipeline from liquefaction, backfill is recommended. Experiments show that the residual pore pressure significantly decreases as backfill depth increases. Fully backfilled pipeline is the best choice for silty seabed. Furthermore, backfill material with coarser particle size than native soil provides better protection for pipeline. In this study, there is no residual pore pressure around the pipeline periphery for three backfill soils (d50 = 0.15 mm; 0.3 mm; and 0.5 mm) tested. Results indicate that for the range of this experimental study, d50 = 0.15 mm is the best backfill material that provides the most protection for the underneath pipeline.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10454/18795
    Version
    Accepted manuscript
    Citation
    Gao Y, Zhang J, Tong L et al (2022) Wave induced silty seabed response around a trenched pipeline. Ocean Engineering. 245: 110527.
    Link to publisher’s version
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110527
    Type
    Article
    Notes
    The full-text of this article will be released for public view at the end of the publisher embargo on 11 Jan 2023.
    Collections
    Engineering and Informatics Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.