BRADFORD SCHOLARS

    • Sign in
    View Item 
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Social Sciences
    • Social Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Social Sciences
    • Social Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Bradford ScholarsCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication Date

    My Account

    Sign in

    HELP

    Bradford Scholars FAQsCopyright Fact SheetPolicies Fact SheetDeposit Terms and ConditionsDigital Preservation Policy

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    The feasibility of patient reported outcome measures for the care of penile cancer

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    branney_et_al_2021.pdf (456.2Kb)
    Download
    Publication date
    2022-07
    Author
    Branney, Peter
    Walters, Elizabeth R.
    Bryant, Eleanor J.
    Hollyhead, Cyan
    Njoku, K.
    Vyas, L.
    Modica, C.
    Kayes, O.
    Eardley, I.
    Henry, A.
    Keyword
    Genital body image
    Lymphedema
    Oncology
    Open audit
    Penile cancer
    Radiology
    Surgery
    Rights
    © 2022 Wiley. This is the peer-reviewed version of the following article: Branney P, Walters ER, Bryant EJ et al (2022) The feasibility of patient reported outcome measures for the care of penile cancer. International Journal of Urological Nursing. xx(xx): xx-xxx, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ijun.12307. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
    Peer-Reviewed
    Yes
    Open Access status
    openAccess
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    When used in routine clinical practice, Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMS) can give patients tacit approval to discuss embarrassing topics, which could be particularly useful for urological nursing. The aim of this study was to assess whether it would be feasible to use two such measures for penile cancer; one for body image (the Male Genital Self-Image Scale; MGSIS-5) and another for lymphedema (the Groin and Lower Limb Lymphedema questionnaire; G3L-20). Study packs were posted to penile cancer patients who had received (i) sentinel node biopsy only, (ii) inguinal node dissection only, and (iii) inguinal node dissection with post-operative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The two measures (MGSIS-5 and G3L-20) were complemented with those specific to sexual function (IIEF) and cancer (EORTC-QLQ-C30 version 3) and a modified Lymphoedema Genitourinary Cancer Questionnaire (mLGUCQ). Twenty patients returned questionnaires. Validity and reliability analyses are presented but low participant numbers mean that results need treating with caution. Results show sufficient feasibility for the MGSIS-5 and the G3L-20 to warrant another study to attract larger numbers of participants, either over a longer time frame or at multiple sites. In these further studies, we would recommend adding (1) more Likert responses, (2) the timeframe to the MGIS and (3) exploring either the use of sexual desire psychometric measures or the addition of sexual desire items to the MGSIS for this patient group.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10454/18715
    Version
    Accepted manuscript
    Citation
    Branney P, Walters ER, Bryant EJ et al (2022) The feasibility of patient reported outcome measures for the care of penile cancer. International Journal of Urological Nursing. 16(2): 138-146.
    Link to publisher’s version
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijun.12307
    Type
    Article
    Collections
    Social Sciences Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.