Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKheirinik, M.
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Shaab
dc.contributor.authorRahmanian, Nejat
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T14:00:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T07:37:54Z
dc.date.available2021-12-13T14:00:57Z
dc.date.available2021-12-23T07:37:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-08
dc.identifier.citationKheirinik M, Ahmed S and Rahmanian N (2021) Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture Processes: Pre-Combustion, Post-Combustion, and Oxy-Fuel Combustion Operations. Sustainability. 13(24): 13567.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/18712
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractEvaluation of economic aspects is one of the main milestones that affect taking rapid actions in dealing with GHGs mitigation; in particular, avoiding CO2 emissions from large source points, such as power plants. In the present study, three kinds of capturing solutions for coal power plants as the most common source of electricity generation have been studied from technical and economic standpoints. Aspen HYSYS (ver.11) has been used to simulate the overall processes, calculate the battery limit, and assess required equipment. The Taylor scoring method has been utilized to calculate the costliness indexes, assessing the capital and investment costs of a 230 MW power plant using anthracite coal with and without post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture technologies. Comparing the costs and the levelized cost of electricity, it was found that pre-combustion is more costly, to the extent that the total investment for it is approximately 1.6 times higher than the oxy-fuel process. Finally, post-combustion, in terms of maturity and cost-effectiveness, seems to be more attractive, since the capital cost and indirect costs are less. Most importantly, this can be applied to the existing plants without major disruption to the current operation of the plants.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su132413567en_US
dc.rights(c) 2021 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_US
dc.subjectCarbon captureen_US
dc.subjectCCSen_US
dc.subjectPost-combustionen_US
dc.subjectPre-combustionen_US
dc.subjectOxy-fuel combustionen_US
dc.subjectCost evaluationen_US
dc.subjectTotal investmentsen_US
dc.subjectTaylor scoring methoden_US
dc.subjectAspen HYSYSen_US
dc.subjectPower plantsen_US
dc.subjectLevelised cost of electricityen_US
dc.titleComparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture Processes: Pre-Combustion, Post-Combustion, and Oxy-Fuel Combustion Operationsen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2021-12-02
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.date.updated2021-12-13T14:01:00Z
refterms.dateFOA2021-12-23T07:38:13Z
dc.openaccess.statusGolden_US


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Published,Kheiniketal.,Dec2021 ...
Size:
5.330Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Kheirinik_et_al_2021

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record