Metamorphosis from exalted person to cultural symbol: A case study of the GOAT in tennis
View/ Open
Main article (656.5Kb)
Download
Publication date
2021-07Rights
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Sage. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Peer-Reviewed
yesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
2021-07-30
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In this article, we suggest that our semiotic understanding of embodiment could be expanded to include a socially exalted individual who embodies a symbol. To illustrate this argument, we draw on an ongoing research project that examines fandom rhetoric and debates around the ‘Greatest of all time’ or the GOAT symbol in Tennis. Grounding Bakhtin’s tri-distinctions of identity, I-for-myself, I-for-other, other-for-me, in a Kantian hermeneutic tradition, we perform a theoretically informed analysis of the GOAT debate. Neither of the three components exists in isolation, rather, they interact in a reflexive dialogue which continually shapes and re-shapes individual consciousness and experiences of embodiment. We apply a ‘Romanticism aesthetic activity’ analytical framework to the tri-distinctions of identity, that consists of ‘creative’ and ‘critical’ rhetoric, within which we found genres of ‘myth,’ ‘art,’ and ‘science.’ Each genre functions, through disparate means to exalt or metamorphise an individual (our focus is on Roger Federer) into a cultural symbol, and that the symbolic form of GOAT reflexively organises the emotional field and identities for those fans deeply invested in it. This paper contributes to the current cultural psychological literature on understanding the mediation of people to symbols in a new digital age.Version
Published versionCitation
Intezar H and Sullivan P (2021) Metamorphosis from exalted person to cultural symbol: A case study of the GOAT in tennis. Culture and Psychology. 28(3): 395–412.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X211044990Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X211044990