Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: barriers and recommendations

View/ Open
Branney_et_al_Accountability_in_Research.pdf (868.9Kb)
Download
Publication date
2023Rights
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
GreenAccepted for publication
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Preregistration is the practice of publicly publishing plans on central components of the research process before access to, or collection, of data. Within the context of the replication crisis, open science practices like preregistration have been pivotal in facilitating greater transparency in research. However, such practices have been applied nearly exclusively to basic academic research, with rare consideration of the relevance to applied and consultancy-based research. This is particularly problematic as such research is typically reported with very low levels of transparency and accountability despite being disseminated as influential grey literature to inform practice. Evidence-based practice is best served by an appreciation of multiple sources of quality evidence, thus the current review considers the potential of preregistration to improve both the accessibility and credibility of applied research towards more rigorous evidence-based practice. The current three-part review outlines, first, the opportunities of preregistration for applied research, and second, three barriers - practical challenges, stakeholder roles, and the suitability of preregistration. Last, this review makes four recommendations to overcome these barriers and maximise the opportunities of preregistration for academics, industry, and the structures they are held within - changes to preregistration templates, new types of templates, education and training, and recognition and structural changes.Version
Published versionCitation
Evans TE, Branney P, Clements A et al (2023) Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: barriers and recommendations. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance. 30(2): 88-108.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1969233Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1969233