An exploration of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) restrictions on marginalised groups in the UK

View/ Open
eshareturi_2021.pdf (313.2Kb)
Download
Publication date
2021-08Rights
(c) 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health. Full-text reproduced with permission pertaining to the Elsevier reuse terms of their Covid-19 resource centre.Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessopenAccess
Accepted for publication
2021-05-23
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
To contain the spread of COVID-19 within the UK over the past year, there have been a series of local and national lockdowns. These restrictions are likely to have impacted upon the health and well-being of marginalised groups who rely on now closed social and community support services to stay healthy. An understanding of the experiences of marginalised people is important; therefore, this study aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 restrictions on the health and well-being of marginalised groups in the UK. Methods: In summer 2020, a rapid telephone survey was conducted by trained, trusted volunteers with 76 participants who were from marginalised groups. As part of this survey, 64 participants consented to describe their experience of lockdown. These case studies were thematically analysed to identify patterns of meaning. Results: Findings indicate that lockdown led to the deterioration of health of participants, impacted adversely on their socio-economic positions and affected access to food and essential supplies. In addition, government public health messaging was considered confusing and inadequate. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for pathways into services which support marginalised groups to remain accessible during periods of restrictions and essential supplies and food to be mapped and protected for marginalised individuals within our local communities.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Eshareturi C, Wareham A, Rattray M et al (2021) An exploration of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) restrictions on marginalised groups in the UK. Journal of Public Health. 197: 6-10.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.05.026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.05.026
Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.05.026