Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHyde, E.
dc.contributor.authorHardy, Maryann L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T16:55:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T14:23:21Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T16:55:43Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30T14:23:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.citationHyde E and Hardy M (2020) Patient centred care in diagnostic radiography (Part 2): A qualitative study of the perceptions of service users and service deliverers. Radiography. 27 (2):322-331.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/18523
dc.descriptionnoen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction There is growing awareness of the importance of patient centred care (PCC) in health care. Within Radiography in the UK, elements of PCC are embedded within professional body publications and guidance documents, but there is limited research evidence exploring whether perceptions of PCC are equivalent between those delivering (radiographers) and those experiencing (patient) care. This study aimed to address this gap by determining compatibility in perceptions of PCC between those using and those delivering radiography services in order to develop measurable indicators of PCC. Methods This project was funded by the College of Radiographers Industry Partnership Scheme. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Derby College of Health & Social Care Ethics committee. This paper reports Stage 2 of the project, which was a series of focus groups and telephone interviews to enable deeper discussion and exploration of PCC. Situational vignettes were used to promote discussion and debate and encourage suggestions for PCC approaches. Audit tools to assess engagement with PCC were developed at individual and organisational level. Results Four focus groups and six telephone interviews were carried out in total. Focus groups were held in a variety of locations to promote attendance. Telephone interviews were used to capture participants who could not attend a focus group in person. Disparity between perceptions of service users and those delivering radiography services on what constitutes high quality PCC was evident. Perceived levels of care and the effectiveness of communication appeared to be the key influences on whether PCC was delivered. Conclusion It is evident from the results of Stage 1 and Stage 2 that we have some way to go before we have parity in how care within diagnostic radiography is perceived, experienced and delivered. Audit tools and an educational toolkit are offered as ways to support increased PCC within diagnostic radiography practice. Implications for practice Several service improvements and audit tools are offered to support the increased delivery of PCC.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPatient centred careen_US
dc.subjectPatient experienceen_US
dc.subjectPerson centred careen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic radiographyen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionsen_US
dc.titlePatient centred care in diagnostic radiography (Part 2): A qualitative study of the perceptions of service users and service deliverersen_US
dc.status.refereedyesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2020-09-06
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repositoryen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.09.008
dc.date.updated2021-06-17T15:55:45Z
refterms.dateFOA2021-06-30T14:24:02Z
dc.openaccess.statusNot Open Accessen_US


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
HydeHardyPCCpaper22020.pdf
Size:
600.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Keep suppressed - published version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record