A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the moblie banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture
View/ Open
Rana_et_al_JBR (596.0Kb)
Download
Publication date
2021-08Keyword
Meta-analysisWeight analysis
Moderator analysis
Mobile banking
m-banking
UTAUT
Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology
Adoption
Rights
© 2021 Elsevier. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
17/04/2021
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In the last few years, several studies have examined the predictors of mobile banking (m-banking) adoption using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). However, contradictory results in some of the UTAUT relationships were found in the existing literature. Therefore, we aim to clarify and synthesize the empirical findings from the m-banking studies published since 2004 by conducting weight and meta-analysis with a focus on the UTAUT theory. We also seek to identify the roles of moderating variables on each UTAUT path. A total of 364 path coefficients from 127 studies were relevant for data analysis. CMA software V3 was employed to combine the effect sizes. All UTAUT relationships were found to be significant. Performance expectancy emerged as the strongest antecedent of usage intention. We also find that usage intention is the most critical predictor of use behavior. It was also revealed that sample size and culture significantly moderated the linkages between facilitating conditions and usage intention, effort expectancy and usage intention, and usage intention and use behavior. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications are also discussed toward the end.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Jadil Y, Rana NP and Dwivedi YK (2021) A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the moblie banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture. Journal of Business Research. 132: 354-372.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.052Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.052