Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSheridan, E.
dc.contributor.authorWright, J.
dc.contributor.authorCorry, P.
dc.contributor.authorOddie, S.
dc.contributor.authorSmall, Neil A.
dc.contributor.authorParslow, R.C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-30T18:58:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T14:09:58Z
dc.date.available2020-11-30T18:58:09Z
dc.date.available2020-12-11T14:09:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-11
dc.identifier.citationSheridan E, Wright J, Corry P et al (2014) Analysis of the Born in Bradford birth cohort - Authors' reply. The Lancet. 383(9912): 123.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/18223
dc.descriptionNoen_US
dc.description.abstractEster Garne and Joan Morris are correct that the Born in Bradford birth cohort data for congenital anomalies do not include pregnancies that terminated before 28 weeks: the data we report refer to liveborn and stillborn infants only. We reported a protective effect of education on anomaly rates but we did not propose any theory to account for the finding because we had no further data that related to this observation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60020-9en_US
dc.subjectBorn in Bradforden_US
dc.subjectCongenital anomaliesen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectMedical researchen_US
dc.subjectInternal medicineen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the Born in Bradford birth cohort - Authors' replyen_US
dc.status.refereedNoen_US
dc.typeLetteren_US
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repositoryen_US
dc.date.updated2020-11-30T18:58:21Z


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record