Institutional use of National Clinical Audits by healthcare providers
View/ Open
mcvey_et_al_2020.pdf (1018.Kb)
Download
Publication date
2021-02Author
McVey, LynnAlvarado, Natasha
Keen, J.
Greenhalgh, J.
Mamas, M.
Gale, C.
Doherty, P.
Feltbower, R.
Elshehaly, Mai
Dowding, D.
Randell, Rebecca
Rights
(c) 2021 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
2020-04-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Healthcare systems worldwide devote significant resources towards collecting data to support care quality assurance and improvement. In the United Kingdom, National Clinical Audits are intended to contribute to these objectives by providing public reports of data on healthcare treatment and outcomes, but their potential for quality improvement in particular is not realized fully among healthcare providers. Here, we aim to explore this outcome from the perspective of hospital boards and their quality committees: an under-studied area, given the emphasis in previous research on the audits' use by clinical teams. Methods: We carried out semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 54 staff in different clinical and management settings in five English National Health Service hospitals about their use of NCA data, and the circumstances that supported or constrained such use. We used Framework Analysis to identify themes within their responses. Results: We found that members and officers of hospitals' governing bodies perceived an imbalance between the benefits to their institutions from National Clinical Audits and the substantial resources consumed by participating in them. This led some to question the audits' legitimacy, which could limit scope for improvements based on audit data, proposed by clinical teams. Conclusions: Measures to enhance the audits' perceived legitimacy could help address these limitations. These include audit suppliers moving from an emphasis on cumulative, retrospective reports to real-time reporting, clearly presenting the “headline” outcomes important to institutional bodies and staff. Measures may also include further negotiation between hospitals, suppliers and their commissioners about the nature and volume of data the latter are expected to collect; wider use by hospitals of routine clinical data to populate audit data fields; and further development of interactive digital technologies to help staff explore and report audit data in meaningful ways.Version
Published versionCitation
McVey L, Alvarado N, Keen J et al (2021) Institutional use of National Clinical Audits by healthcare providers. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 27(1): 143-150.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13403Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13403