Citizens' continuous use of eGovernment services: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectations and satisfaction
View/ Open
Weerakkody_Government_Information_Quarterly.pdf (549.5Kb)
Download
Publication date
2020-07Rights
© 2020 Elsevier. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccessAccepted for publication
30/04/2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The continuous use of eGovernment services is a de facto for its prosperity and success. A generalised sense of citizens' self-efficacy, expectations, and satisfaction offer opportunities for governments to further retain needed engagements. This study examines the factors influencing citizens' continuance use of eGovernment services. Through the integration of Social Cognitive Theory, Expectation Confirmation Theory, DeLone and McLean IS success model, and E-S-QUAL, a survey of 471 citizens in the UK, engaging in online public services, found that prior experience, social influence, information quality, and service quality, personal outcome expectation, and satisfaction, are significant predictors of citizens' intention to use eGovernment, when they are regulated, through citizens' self-efficacy. The present study extends the roles of pre-adoption and post-adoption by offering a self-regulating process. Therefore, it demonstrates how critical it is for the government's leaders to understand the patterns of the long-term process for electronic systems continually.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Alruwaie M, El-Haddadeh R, Weerakkody V et al (2020) Citizens' continuous use of eGovernment services: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectations and satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly. 37(3): 101485.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101485Type
ArticleNotes
There is a corrigendum for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101492. Elvira Ismagilova was not included as an author on the original record when she should have been.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101485