Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHardy, Maryann L.
dc.contributor.authorSnaith, Beverly
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-05T10:29:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T14:00:41Z
dc.date.available2020-03-05T10:29:36Z
dc.date.available2020-03-31T14:00:41Z
dc.date.issued2006-11
dc.identifier.citationHardy M and Snaith B (2006) Role extension and role advancement - Is there a difference? A discussion paper. Radiography. 12(4): 327-331.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/17737
dc.descriptionNoen_US
dc.description.abstractThe terms ‘extended’ and ‘advanced’ practice are commonly used to describe clinical practitioner roles. However, these terms have not been clearly defined within the context of modern radiography practice despite their fundamental importance to establishing the 4 tier structure, implementing Agenda for Change and promoting a coherent clinical radiography career structure. This paper discusses the terms ‘extension’ and ‘advancement’ in relation to radiography practice and, using evidence from the debates of other health professions, attempts to offer some clarity to the terminology, presenting one interpretation of its possible application to the radiographer role in the United Kingdom.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2005.09.004en_US
dc.subjectExtended roleen_US
dc.subjectRole extensionen_US
dc.subjectRole advancementen_US
dc.subjectAdvanced practiceen_US
dc.subjectAdvanced practitioneren_US
dc.subjectRadiographeren_US
dc.titleRole extension and role advancement - Is there a difference? A discussion paperen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2005-09-07
dc.date.application2005-11-14
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repositoryen_US
dc.date.updated2020-03-05T10:29:41Z


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record