Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHardy, Maryann L.
dc.contributor.authorSnaith, Beverly
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-05T10:29:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T14:00:41Z
dc.date.available2020-03-05T10:29:36Z
dc.date.available2020-03-31T14:00:41Z
dc.date.issued2006-11
dc.identifier.citationHardy M and Snaith B (2006) Role extension and role advancement - Is there a difference? A discussion paper. Radiography. 12(4): 327-331.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/17737
dc.descriptionNo
dc.description.abstractThe terms ‘extended’ and ‘advanced’ practice are commonly used to describe clinical practitioner roles. However, these terms have not been clearly defined within the context of modern radiography practice despite their fundamental importance to establishing the 4 tier structure, implementing Agenda for Change and promoting a coherent clinical radiography career structure. This paper discusses the terms ‘extension’ and ‘advancement’ in relation to radiography practice and, using evidence from the debates of other health professions, attempts to offer some clarity to the terminology, presenting one interpretation of its possible application to the radiographer role in the United Kingdom.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectExtended role
dc.subjectRole extension
dc.subjectRole advancement
dc.subjectAdvanced practice
dc.subjectAdvanced practitioner
dc.subjectRadiographer
dc.titleRole extension and role advancement - Is there a difference? A discussion paper
dc.status.refereedYes
dc.date.Accepted2005-09-07
dc.date.application2005-11-14
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.versionNo full-text in the repository
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2005.09.004
dc.date.updated2020-03-05T10:29:41Z


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record