Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaynor, D.K.
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Hanif
dc.contributor.authorBlenkinsopp, Alison
dc.contributor.authorFylan, Beth
dc.contributor.authorArmitage, Gerry R.
dc.contributor.authorSilcock, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-28T15:00:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-10T13:15:03Z
dc.date.available2020-02-28T15:00:39Z
dc.date.available2020-03-10T13:15:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.citationRaynor DK, Ismail H, Blenkinsopp A et al (2020) Experience-based co-design - Adapting the method for a researcher-initiated study in a multi-site setting. Health Expectations. 23(3): 562-570.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/17701
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Experience-based co-design (EBCD) brings patients and staff together to co-design services. It is normally conducted in one organization which initiates and implements the process. We used the traditional EBCD method with a number of adaptations as part of a larger research study in the British National Health Service.Methods: The primary aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conduct-ing research-initiated EBCD, to enhance intervention development prior to testing. As well as embedding the method in a research study, there were 3 further key adap-tations: (a) working across primary and secondary care sectors, (b) working on multi-ple sites and (c) incorporating theory-informed analysis.Results: We recruited four sites (covering both primary and secondary care) and, on each site, conducted the initial traditional EBCD meetings, with separate staff and patient groups—followed by a single joint patient-staff event, where four priority areas for co-design were agreed. This event was driven by theory-informed analysis, as well as the traditional trigger film of patient experiences. Each site worked on one priority area, and the four co-design groups met over 2-3 months to design prototype tools. A second joint event was held (not usually undertaken in single-site EBCD) where they shared and compared outputs. The research team combined elements of these outputs to create an intervention, now being tested in a cluster randomized controlled trial.Conclusions: EBCD can be successfully adapted for use across an entire patient pathway with multiple organizations and as part of a research process to identify an intervention for subsequent testing in a randomized trial. Our pragmatic approach used the patient experience to identify areas for improvement and co-designed an intervention which directly reflected patient priorities.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research programme ‘Improving the safety and continuity of medicines management at care transitions (ISCOMAT)’ RP‐PG‐0514‐2009.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13028en_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.subjectAdapted methoden_US
dc.subjectCodesignen_US
dc.subjectComplex interventionen_US
dc.subjectExperience-based co-designen_US
dc.titleExperience-based co-design - Adapting the method for a researcher-initiated study in a multi-site settingen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2019-12-31
dc.date.application2020-02-11
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.date.updated2020-02-28T15:00:45Z
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-10T13:16:06Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Silcock_et_al_Health_Expectati ...
Size:
488.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record