Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcEachan, Rosemary
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, N.
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, R.
dc.contributor.authorLawton, R.
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Peter H.
dc.contributor.authorConner, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-20T15:41:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-06T11:20:30Z
dc.date.available2020-02-20T15:41:18Z
dc.date.available2020-03-06T11:20:30Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMcEachan R, Taylor N, Harrison R et al (2016) Meta-Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 50(4): 592-612.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/17681
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reasoned action approach (RAA) includes subcomponents of attitude (experiential/instrumental), perceived norm (injunctive/descriptive), and perceived behavioral control (capacity/autonomy) to predict intention and behavior. Purpose: To provide a meta-analysis of the RAA for health behaviors focusing on comparing the pairs of RAA subcomponents and differences between health protection and health-risk behaviors. Methods: The present research reports a meta-analysis of correlational tests of RAA subcomponents, examination of moderators, and combined effects of subcomponents on intention and behavior. Regressions were used to predict intention and behavior based on data from studies measuring all variables. Results: Capacity and experiential attitude had large, and other constructs had small-medium-sized correlations with intention; all constructs except autonomy were significant independent predictors of intention in regressions. Intention, capacity, and experiential attitude had medium-large, and other constructs had small-medium-sized correlations with behavior; intention, capacity, experiential attitude, and descriptive norm were significant independent predictors of behavior in regressions. Conclusions: The RAA subcomponents have utility in predicting and understanding health behaviors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9798-4en_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2016. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US
dc.subjectReasoned action approachen_US
dc.subjectTheory of planned behavioren_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectHealth behavioren_US
dc.subjectProtection behaviorsen_US
dc.subjectRisk behaviorsen_US
dc.titleMeta-Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviorsen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2016-03-03
dc.date.application2016-05-11
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.date.updated2020-02-20T15:41:20Z
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-06T11:23:07Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Gardner_P_2016.pdf
Size:
667.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record