View/ Open
gudmundsdottir_et_al_2019.pdf (231.6Kb)
Download
Publication date
2019Rights
© 2019 Taylor & Francis. The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in International Journal of Multilingualism from 23 May 2019 at https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1617717.Peer-Reviewed
Yes
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This study examined whether the proposed bilingual advantage in inhibitory control and working memory can be extended to a trilingual advantage, and assessed any age-related effects on a continuum in young adults to older adults. Trilinguals, bilinguals and monolinguals’ performance on the Simon task and a numerical version of the N-back task was compared. On the Simon task, there was no language group difference observed, although the data show an age-related decline in inhibitory control only in trilinguals, but not in bilinguals or monolinguals. No clear language group differences were observed between trilinguals and bilinguals on the N-back task, however an overall trilingual and bilingual disadvantage, compared to monolinguals, was observed. Together the results suggest that managing two or three languages, compared to just one, may have a negative impact on inhibitory control and working memory performance. Importantly, they highlight the need to control for a possible confounding effect of including trilinguals/multilinguals in bilingual cohorts and to ensure that participants in monolingual cohorts speak only one language.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Guðmundsdóttir MD and Lesk VE (2019) Does the bilingual advantage extend to trilingualism?. International Journal of Multilingualism. 16(4): 549-562.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1617717Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1617717