Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector
View/ Open
Main article (426.1Kb)
Download
Publication date
2017Rights
© 2017 Elsevier. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccess
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper examines the relationship between board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector. We show how the board size, board independence and combining the role of CEO and chairperson in boards may affect corporate risk taking in financial firms. Our sample is based on a panel dataset of all publicly listed firms in the UK financial sector, which includes banks, insurance, real estate and financial services companies over a ten year period (2003-2012). After controlling for the effects of endogeneity through the application of the dynamic panel generalized method of moments estimator, the findings of this study suggest that the presence of non-executive directors and powerful CEOs in corporate boards reduces corporate risk taking practices in financial firms. The negative relationship can be explained within the agency theory context, where managers are regarded as more risk averse because of the reputational and employment risk. An increased power concentration is therefore expected to enhance the risk aversion behaviour of directors. The findings however, do not show any significant effect of board size on corporate risk taking in financial firms. As this study covers recommendations of the UK Corporate Governance Code on the role of corporate boards in managing firms’ risk, the empirical evidence could be useful for corporate governance regulation and policy making.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Akbar S, Kharabsheh B, Poletti Hughes J and Shah SZA (2017) Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector. International Review of Financial Analysis. 50 :101-110.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.02.001Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.02.001