Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Catherine*
dc.contributor.authorNelis, S.M.*
dc.contributor.authorMartyr, A.*
dc.contributor.authorVictor, C.*
dc.contributor.authorMorris, R.G.*
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-08T16:20:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-25T09:23:08Z
dc.date.available2019-04-08T16:20:25Z
dc.date.available2019-04-25T09:23:08Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.identifier.citationQuinn C, Nelis SM, Martyr A et al (2019) Influence of positive and negative dimensions of dementia caregiving on caregiver well-being and satisfaction with life: Findings from the IDEAL study. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 27(8): 838-848.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/16982
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to identify the potential impact of positive and negative dimensions of caregiving on caregiver well-being and satisfaction with life (SwL). This study used time-point one data from the Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (also known as IDEAL)cohort study that involved 1,283 informal caregivers of people in the mild-to-moderate stages of dementia recruited from 29 sites within Great Britain. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to investigate the associations between positive dimensions of caregiving (measured by caregiving competence and perceptions of positive aspects of caregiving), negative dimensions of caregiving (measured by caregiving stress and role captivity), and caregiver well-being and SwL. Lower well-being was associated with low caregiving competence (–13.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]:–16.67, –10.87), perceiving fewer positive aspects of caregiving (–7.67; 95% CI:–10.26, –5.07), high caregiving stress (–24.45; 95% CI:–26.94, –21.96), and high role captivity (–15.61; 95% CI:–18.33, –12.89). Lower SwL was associated with low caregiving competence (–4.61; 95% CI:–5.57, –3.66), perceiving fewer positive aspects of caregiving (–3.09; 95% CI:–3.94, –2.25), high caregiving stress (–7.88; 95% CI:–8.71, –7.06), and high role captivity (–6.41; 95% CI:–7.27, –5.54). When these four measures were combined within the same model, only positive aspects of caregiving and caregiving stress retained independent associations with well-being and SwL. Both positive and negative dimensions of caregiving were associated with caregiver well-being and SwL. Psychological therapies and interventions need to consider not only the negative aspects of caregiving but also positive caregiving experiences and their implications for caregiver well-being and SwL.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.02.005en_US
dc.rights(c) 2019 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_US
dc.subjectCompetenceen_US
dc.subjectGainsen_US
dc.subjectStressen_US
dc.subjectRole-captivityen_US
dc.subjectPositive aspects of caregivingen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectResearch Development Fund Publication Prize Award
dc.titleInfluence of positive and negative dimensions of dementia caregiving on caregiver well-being and satisfaction with life: Findings from the IDEAL studyen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.Accepted2019-02-06
dc.date.application2019-02-11
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionAccepted manuscripten_US
dc.description.publicnotesThe IDEAL data will be deposited with the UK Data Archive upon completion of the study. Details on how the data can be accessed will be made available on the project website www.idealproject.org.uk.en_US
dc.description.publicnotesResearch Development Fund Publication Prize Award winner, February 2019.
dc.date.updated2019-04-08T16:20:37Z
refterms.dateFOA2019-04-25T09:23:44Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
quinn_et_al_2019.pdf
Size:
411.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record