Healthcare practice placements: back to the drawing board?
|dc.identifier.citation||Millington P, Hellawell M, Graham C et al (2019) Healthcare practice placements: back to the drawing board? British Journal of Healthcare Management. 25(3): 145-153.||en_US|
|dc.description.abstract||Background: Sourcing healthcare practice placements continues to present a challenge for higher education institutions. Equally, the provision of clinical placements by healthcare providers is not at the forefront of their agenda. In view of this, the historic and traditional models of clinical placements is becoming more difficult to provide. In light of this, new models of clinical placements are being explored. Aims: This literature review explores the differing models of clinical placements in use and examines the merits and limitation of each. Methods: A mixed-methods literature review with a pragmatic approach has been used. Findings: Several placement models were described, including the traditional 1:1 model as well as 2:1, 3:1. The hub and spoke, capacity development facilitator, collaborative learning in practice and role emerging placement models were also discussed. Conclusion: There is a considerable paucity of high-quality evidence evaluating differing placement modules. Further research is required to evaluate the differing placement models from a students, clinical educators and service user’s perspective.||en_US|
|dc.rights||This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in British Journal of Healthcare Management copyright © MA Healthcare, after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2019.25.3.145.|
|dc.subject||Hub and spoke||en_US|
|dc.subject||Practice placements models||en_US|
|dc.subject||Role emerging placements||en_US|
|dc.title||Healthcare practice placements: back to the drawing board?||en_US|