Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalgado, J.F.*
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Neil*
dc.contributor.authorTauriz, G.*
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-20T15:12:58Z
dc.date.available2019-02-20T15:12:58Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.identifier.citationSalgado JF, Anderson N and Tauriz G (2015) The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 88(4): 797-934.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10454/16826
dc.descriptionYesen_US
dc.description.abstractA comprehensive meta‐analysis of two types of forced‐choice (FC) personality inventories (ipsative and quasi‐ipsative) across nine occupational groups (Clerical, Customer Service, Health Care, Managerial, Military, Police, Sales, Skilled Manual, and Supervisory) is reported. Quasi‐ipsative measures showed substantially higher operational validity coefficients and validity generalization across all occupations than ipsative measures. Results also showed that, compared with the findings of previous meta‐analyses, quasi‐ipsative personality inventories are better predictors of job performance than previously thought and that operational validities for ipsative measures are notably congruent with past findings. We conclude that quasi‐ipsative scale formats are superior for predicting job performance for all occupational groups. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings for personnel selection are discussed in 4.4.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Economy and Competitiveness. Grant Number: PSI2011‐27943. Leverhulme Trust. Grant Number: IN‐2012‐095en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12098en_US
dc.rights© 2014 The British Psychological Society. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Salgado JF, Anderson N and Tauriz G (2015) The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 88(4): 797-934, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12098. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.en_US
dc.subjectForced-choiceen_US
dc.subjectJob performanceen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectPersonalityen_US
dc.subjectQuasi-ipsative inventoriesen_US
dc.titleThe validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: a comprehensive meta-analysisen_US
dc.status.refereedYesen_US
dc.date.application2014-12-17
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.versionAccepted manuscripten_US
refterms.dateFOA2019-02-20T15:12:58Z


Item file(s)

Thumbnail
Name:
Anderson_JOOP.pdf
Size:
542.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record