BRADFORD SCHOLARS

    • Sign in
    View Item 
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Life Sciences
    • Life Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    •   Bradford Scholars
    • Life Sciences
    • Life Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Bradford ScholarsCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication Date

    My Account

    Sign in

    HELP

    Bradford Scholars FAQsCopyright Fact SheetPolicies Fact SheetDeposit Terms and ConditionsDigital Preservation Policy

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A context-consent meta-framework for designing open (qualitative) data studies

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Publication date
    2019
    Author
    Branney, Peter
    Reid, K.
    Frost, N.
    Coan, S.
    Mathieson, A.
    Woolhouse, M.
    Keyword
    Open science
    Open data
    Qualitative methods
    Replicability debate
    Psychology
    Context and consent
    Archaeology of context and consent
    Rights
    © 2019 Taylor & Francis. This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology in 2019. Available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605477
    Peer-Reviewed
    yes
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    To date, open science, and particularly open data, in Psychology, has focused on quantitative research. This paper aims to explore ethical and practical issues encountered by UK-based psychologists utilising open qualitative datasets. Semi-structured telephone interviews with eight qualitative psychologists were explored using a framework analysis. From the findings, we offer a context-consent meta-framework as a resource to help in the design of studies sharing their data and/or studies using open data. We recommend ‘secondary’ studies conduct archaeologies of context and consent to examine if the data available is suitable for their research questions. This research is the first we know of in the study of ‘doing’ (or not doing) open science, which could be repeated to develop a longitudinal picture or complemented with additional approaches, such as observational studies of how context and consent are negotiated in pre-registered studies and open data.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16738
    Version
    Accepted Manuscript
    Citation
    Branney P, Reid K, Frost N, Coan S, Mathieson A, and Woolhouse M (2019) A context-consent meta-framework for designing open (qualitative) data studies. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 16(3): 483-502.
    Link to publisher’s version
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605477
    Type
    Article
    Notes
    The author's manuscript has a slightly different title from the published article: A meta-framework for designing open data studies in psychology: ethical and practical issues of open qualitative data sets
    Collections
    Life Sciences Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.