The Core Value Compass: visually evaluating the goodness of brands that do good
View/ Open
Main article (955.8Kb)
Download
Publication date
2018Rights
© 2018 Palgrave Macmillan. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Brand Management. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0074-0Peer-Reviewed
YesOpen Access status
openAccess
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Brands that do good for the society as well as for themselves are motivated by the core values they espouse, which necessitates a better understanding of what qualities a true core value must possess. The inherent tension within brands that do good, between commercial interests to increase competitiveness, and societal interests that are closely linked to the brand’s authenticity, has largely been overlooked. Hence, we develop and demonstrate a relatively easy-to-apply visual tool for evaluating core values based on a set of ‘goodness’ criteria derived from extant theory. The Core Value Compass adopts a paradox-based, evolutionary perspective by incorporating the inherent tensions within true core values, and classifying them according to their temporal orientation. Thus, we contribute towards a better understanding of underlying tensions of core values and provide a practical tool that paves the way for improved, and indeed ethical, corporate branding strategies. Furthermore, we demonstrate the Compass’ application using the case of a public sector brand, which is a quintessential brand that does good. Therefore, we also contribute to the nascent theoretical discourse on public sector branding. This paper therefore adds to the notable attempts to bridge the gap between theory and practice in core values-based corporate branding.Version
Accepted manuscriptCitation
Yoganathan V, McLeay F, Osburg V-S and Hart D (2018) Journal of Brand Management. 25(1): 68–83.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0074-0Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0074-0