
View/ Open
Main article (217.0Kb)
Download
Publication date
2018Author
Solas, John
Keyword
ConscienceConscientious objection
Corporate codes of conduct
Corporate wrongdoing
Followers
Leaders
Whistleblowing
Rights
© 2018 Wiley This is the peer reviewed version of the article above which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12162 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.Peer-Reviewed
YesAccepted for publication
2018-05-23
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In recent years, there has been increasing concern about unethical conduct within corporate business, not least because of the scandalous behaviour of former chief executives at top blue chip companies such as Enron, Worldcom, Parmalat and Volkswagen. These scandals have not only threatened the privileged position of senior corporate employees but also the solvency of the companies they manage and lead. The high profile cases of corporate crime and corruption that occurred in the early 2000s together with the 2008 Wall Street bailouts (Sorokin 2010) and the growth in criminal prosecutions since (Garrett 2014) have raised the profile of business ethics to an unprecedented level. Greater public sensitivity towards and awareness about the unlawful and immoral conduct of firms in the United States and elsewhere, has created demand for organizations to become more accountable and socially responsible and prompted greater regulatory scrutiny. It has also served to highlight the embryonic (Ciulla 2005) and delimited (Freidland 2012) state of research and scholarship on business ethics, where the focus has tended to remain on leadership (Kellerman 2012). A neglected, though important, line of ethical enquiry concerns followership (Kellerman, 2008). Corporate wrongdoing would be less formidable and extensive if it was not aided and abetted. Two key questions arise. First, what prompts followers to support rather than oppose bad leaders? Second, what can be done to stem or at least curtail their allegiance to bad leaders?Version
Accepted ManuscriptCitation
Solas J (2018) Conscientious Objections to Corporate Wrongdoing. Business and Society Review. 124(1): 43-62.Link to Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12162Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12162